It is important for people to take the measurements at the same sites each time. People can then enter these measurements into an online calculator , which estimates body fat percentage. It is important to note that skinfold measurements vary widely, and body fat distribution can differ, based on race, age, sex, and physical activity.

A person can easily estimate their body fat percentage by measuring the circumference of different parts of their body. They should use a tape measure to do this. To get a more accurate estimation, measure the circumference of the neck and waist.

Females should also measure the circumference of the hips. Take measurements at the widest point, and ensure that the tape measure does not compress the skin. Some bathroom scales estimate body fat percentage.

They use a method called bioelectrical impedance analysis BIA. BIA involves passing a very weak electrical current through the body to measure its resistance to the current. Body fat is particularly resistant, meaning that it conducts electricity less effectively than other tissues and substances within the body.

Therefore, measurements that show a greater resistance indicate a higher body fat mass. Scales can use this measurement and information about gender, age, and height to estimate body fat percentage. According to a study , BIA can give a reasonable estimate of body fat percentage.

However, it is not the most accurate method available. A DEXA scan uses X-rays to precisely measure body fat, lean muscle, and mineral composition in different parts of the body. The scan is similar to any X-ray and only takes a few minutes.

The amount of radiation that the scan emits is low. Typically, researchers use DEXA scans to measure body fat percentage in research settings. The test is not readily available to the general public. There are no specific guidelines about who should undergo DEXA scanning for body fat analysis.

However, researchers suggest that the scans may help with treatment for the following groups:. This helps with assessing body fat composition.

In order to determine body density, a person must divide body weight, or mass, by body volume. The volume of an object is how much space it takes up. Hydrodensitometry involves submerging a person in water and measuring the volume of water that they displace. This displacement indicates body volume.

Following hydrodensitometry, a person can use body mass and volume measurements to calculate body density with an equation. A further equation converts body density into body fat percentage.

During ADP, a person sits inside an enclosed device called a Bod Pod. Scales inside the Bod Pod measure body mass, while air pressure sensors measure the amount of air displaced by the person.

The volume of air displaced indicates body volume. A 3D body scanner uses lasers to create a 3D image of the body. The scanner rotates to take pictures of the body from different angles, and the scan is quick, taking only a few seconds.

A computer then combines the individual pictures to form the 3D image. With this image, it is possible to determine body volume. Dividing body mass by body volume can indicate body density. Below are body fat ranges for males and females, according to the American College of Sports Medicine :.

There are various ways to accurately measure body fat percentage. Some methods are simple and inexpensive, while others are more complicated and costly. Some of these methods, including DEXA scans, hydrodensitometry, and ADP, are only available at specialized facilities.

However, a person can estimate their body fat composition at home by other means. A doctor or personal trainer can offer additional advice on taking accurate body measurements. Body fat scales are devices that estimate the relative percentages of fat and muscle inside the body. Read on to learn about how they work and their….

BMI is one measure of body size. Learn about how to calculate BMI for men, the recommended BMI range, and the limitations of BMI as an indicator of…. Body fat scales can be an easy way to track body composition, but research debates their accuracy.

Here, learn about body fat scales and the best…. Sustainable weight management involves eating a balanced diet, exercising regularly, and engaging in stress-reducing techniques. See the descriptions and photographs of each skinfold site. It is best to use the sum of several sites to monitor and compare body fat measures.

In order to satisfy those who want to calculate a percentage body fat measure, there is a sample of equations for calculating this here. Below is a table of general guidelines based on personal experience for using total sum in millimeters of the seven main skinfold sites tricep , bicep , subscap , supraspinale , abdominal , thigh , calf.

There are also examples of some actual athlete results. target population: suitable for all populations, though it is sometimes difficult to get reliable measurements with obese people. validity: using skinfold measurements is not a valid predictor of percent bodyfat, however they can be used as a monitoring device to indicate changes in body composition over time.

It is important to maintain correct calibration of the calipers more about calibrating calipers. reliability: the reliability of skinfold measurements can vary from tester to tester depending on their skill and experience.

There are accreditation courses available through ISAK. advantages: Skinfold measurements are widely utilized to assess body composition. It is a lot simpler than hydrostatic weighing and many of the other body composition techniques. After the original outlay for calipers, the daily tests costs are minimal.

other considerations: some participants may feel uncomfortable stripping down in front of the tester, therefore every effect should be made to make them feel comfortable. For legal reasons, it is wise to have another person present, and to have females testers for female participants.

The right side measurement is standard, though in some situations you may need to test someone on the left side. If so, you must record this and endeavor to always test on the same side for that person. Reasons for testing on the left side may include injuries, amputation, deformities, or other medical conditions.

We have over fitness tests listed, so it's not easy to choose the best one to use. You should consider the validity, reliability, costs and ease of use for each test. Use our testing guide to conducting, recording, and interpreting fitness tests. Any questions, please ask or search for your answer.

To keep up with the latest in sport science and this website, subscribe to our newsletter. We are also on facebook and twitter. home search sitemap store. newsletter facebook X twitter. privacy policy disclaimer copyright.

contact author info advertising.

Estimating body fat percentage with skinfold calipers is affordable and relatively simple once you know how to do it. However, the accuracy depends on the skill of the person performing the assessment. Body shape varies from person to person, and the shape of your body provides information about your body fat 4.

For men, the circumferences of the neck and waist are used in this equation. For women, the circumference of the hips is also included 5. Using body circumferences to estimate body fat is quick and easy.

However, the accuracy of this method can vary widely and is not considered an ideal method of measuring body fat percentage. As the name implies, DXA uses X-rays of two different energies to estimate your body fat percentage 6.

During a DXA scan, you lie on your back for approximately 10 minutes while an X-ray scans over you. The amount of radiation from a DXA scan is very low. DXA is also used to assess bone density and provides detailed information about the bone, lean mass and fat in separate body regions arms, legs and torso 8.

DXA is more accurate than many other methods of assessing body fat percentage. This method, also known as underwater weighing or hydrodensitometry, estimates your body composition based on its density 9.

This technique weighs you while submerged under water after exhaling as much air as possible from your lungs. You are also weighed while you are on dry land, and the amount of air left in your lungs after you exhale is estimated or measured.

All of this information is entered into equations to determine the density of your body. Hydrostatic weighing is an accurate way to assess your body fat. Similar to hydrostatic weighing, air displacement plethysmography ADP estimates your body fat percentage based on the density of your body 9.

However, ADP uses air instead of water. The relationship between the volume and pressure of air allows this device to predict the density of your body You sit inside an egg-shaped chamber for several minutes while the pressure of the air inside the chamber is altered.

To obtain accurate measurements, you need to wear skin-tight clothing or a bathing suit during testing. The Bod Pod is the main ADP device currently used. It predicts your body fat with air rather than water. BIA devices detect how your body responds to small electrical currents. This is done by placing electrodes on your skin.

Some electrodes send currents into your body, while others receive the signal after it has passed through your body tissues. Electrical currents move through muscle easier than fat due to the higher water content of muscle BIA devices work by sending small electrical currents through your body to see how easily they travel through your tissues.

Many different devices are available, although advanced devices produce more accurate results. BIS and BIA devices look similar but use different technology.

BIS uses a much larger number of electrical currents than BIA, in addition to high and low frequencies, to mathematically predict your amount of body fluid BIS also analyzes the information differently, and some researchers believe that BIS is more accurate than BIA 14 , However, similar to BIA, BIS uses the body fluid information it gathers to predict your body composition based on equations The accuracy of both of these methods depends on how similar you are to the people for whom these equations were developed However, BIS uses more electrical currents and processes the information differently.

However, while BIA and BIS send currents through your whole body, EIM sends currents through smaller regions of your body These devices are placed on different parts of the body to estimate the body fat of those specific areas Because this device is placed directly on specific body regions, it has some similarities to skinfold calipers, although the technologies are very different.

EIM injects electrical currents into small body regions. Portable devices are placed directly on different body parts to estimate the body fat percentage at those locations. More research is needed to establish the accuracy of this method.

For some devices, you stand on a rotating platform for several minutes while the sensors detect your body shape. Other devices use sensors that rotate around your body.

In this way, 3-D body scanners are similar to circumference measurements. However, a greater amount of information is provided by a 3-D scanner The method uses information about your body shape to predict your body fat percentage. More information is needed about the accuracy of these methods.

Multi-compartment models are considered to be the most accurate method of body composition assessment 3 , These models split the body into three or more parts.

The most common assessments are called 3-compartment and 4-compartment models. These models require multiple tests to get estimates of body mass, body volume, body water and bone content For example, hydrostatic weighing or ADP can provide body volume, BIS or BIA can provide body water and DXA can measure bone content.

Information from each of these methods is combined to build a more complete picture of the body and obtain the most accurate body fat percentage 21 , However, they involve multiple tests and are not typically available to the general public.

Some methods, such as skinfold measurements, circumference calculations and portable BIA devices, are inexpensive and allow you to be measured in your own home as frequently as you like.

The devices can also be purchased online easily, such as on Amazon. Most of the methods with highest accuracies are not available to use in your own home.

If you want a more accurate assessment and are willing to pay for it, you could pursue a method with good accuracy like hydrostatic weighing, ADP or DXA.

Ideally, you should do the test before you have anything to drink, especially for methods that rely on electrical signals like BIA, BIS and EIM. Assessing yourself the same way each time will reduce error rates and make it easier to tell if you are making progress.

However, you should always interpret your results from any method with caution. Read the Skinfold Guide for a comparison of available calipers. pre-test: Explain the test procedures to the subject.

Perform screening of health risks and obtain informed consent. Prepare forms and record basic information such as age, height, body weight, gender, test conditions. Calipers should be calibrated for correct jaw tension and gap width.

See more details of pre-test procedures. procedure: Skinfold measurement can use from 3 to 9 different standard anatomical sites around the body. The right side is usually only measured for consistency.

The tester pinches the skin at the appropriate site to raise a double layer of skin and the underlying adipose tissue, but not the muscle. The calipers are then applied 1 cm below and at right angles to the pinch, and a reading in millimeters mm taken two seconds later.

The mean of two measurements should be taken. If the two measurements differ greatly, a third should then be done, then the median value taken.

the sites: there are many common sites at which the skinfold pinch can be taken. See the descriptions and photographs of each skinfold site. It is best to use the sum of several sites to monitor and compare body fat measures.

In order to satisfy those who want to calculate a percentage body fat measure, there is a sample of equations for calculating this here. Below is a table of general guidelines based on personal experience for using total sum in millimeters of the seven main skinfold sites tricep , bicep , subscap , supraspinale , abdominal , thigh , calf.

There are also examples of some actual athlete results. target population: suitable for all populations, though it is sometimes difficult to get reliable measurements with obese people. validity: using skinfold measurements is not a valid predictor of percent bodyfat, however they can be used as a monitoring device to indicate changes in body composition over time.

It is important to maintain correct calibration of the calipers more about calibrating calipers. reliability: the reliability of skinfold measurements can vary from tester to tester depending on their skill and experience.

There are accreditation courses available through ISAK. advantages: Skinfold measurements are widely utilized to assess body composition.

It is a lot simpler than hydrostatic weighing and many of the other body composition techniques. After the original outlay for calipers, the daily tests costs are minimal.

other considerations: some participants may feel uncomfortable stripping down in front of the tester, therefore every effect should be made to make them feel comfortable. For legal reasons, it is wise to have another person present, and to have females testers for female participants.

However, these sources of error do not occur with MuscleSound body composition assessment. This is because, even though we use the same prediction equations, our measurement methodology fundamentally differs from skinfolds.

Ultrasound measures of subcutaneous fat, by their very nature, are far more consistent, accurate and reliable than skinfold measures. We have demonstrated the accuracy and reliability of this methodology with only a brief period of training.

The remainder of this article lists the inherent error potentials of skinfold measurements and describes each one with comparative aspects of the MuscleSound protocol. But this is not always possible. When this occurs, caliper placement is an issue for even the most experienced tester.

Typically they will just use their best judgment and hope they can replicate the caliper placement on subsequent measures. Clearly this is not the best case for reliability!

As illustrated by the graphic below, the Ultrasound probe is placed firmly and comfortably on the surface of the site to be measured and we take a direct, linear measure of the subcutaneous fat layer. As the skinfold calipers are placed around the fold, the fat layers compress in an amount proportional to the force exerted by the caliper.

However, this force is not the same for all makes of caliper. For example force differences of between g and g have been reported for the five most popular models of caliper. Also, if calipers are not regularly calibrated, there is a danger of errors occurring between the same caliper models.

The length of time caliper jaws are kept on the fold will also impact how much the fat layer is compressed. Skinfold Best Practice is 4 seconds. A shorter or longer time than this will result in a correspondingly greater or lesser reading on the caliper dial. When a fold is hard to lift and you are trying to get as close to parallel sides as possible, it is necessary to squeeze really hard!

For some individuals lifting a difficult fold is too painful for them to bear! In contrast, with MuscleSound there are no compression, pain or ticklishness issues. As illustrated by the graphic above, the Ultrasound wand is placed firmly and comfortably on the surface of the site to be measured and we take a direct, linear measure of the subcutaneous fat layer.

When you have a subsequent skinfold measurement, if your skinfolds sum is not in the range of the previous measurement, then you know there has been a true change in fat mass, however if it falls within that range then it can be viewed that skinfolds have remained stable.

Frequent ongoing measurement of your skinfolds will be a valuable tool in helping you monitor body composition over time. We recommend every weeks depending on the athlete and sport. When using your body weight to compliment your skinfold assessments, remember to weigh yourself at the same time every time you weigh yourself as weight can be influenced by the time of day or month for females and hydration status lighter if dehydrated.

Anyone can have their skinfolds done. If you have a goal of increasing your muscle mass, assessing skinfolds will show you whether increases in mass are due to increases of muscle, fat mass or both.

In sports, skinfolds are another tool used to assess the effectiveness of your training. Some sports have certain physique traits associated with them, such as gymnastics or diving. In endurance sports such as marathons and cycling, lower body fat levels enhance efficiency and heat dissipation.

In other sports with weight classes such as rowing or boxing, lower body fat levels will help enhance power to weight ratio compared to smaller, less muscular opponents.

In team sports such as rugby, different positions on the field have different roles requiring different body compositions to effectively be able to achieve their roles.

Ongoing skinfold assessments are the most effective tool for monitoring body composition changes over time, and as an athlete, are just one of your tools that you can use to assess your progress in performance.

If you are interested in knowing more about skinfold assessments, having yourself assessed, or genrally interested in getting a strategic nutrition plan to support your training and lifestyle goals, contact our Sports Dietitian Kelsey Hutton, who will be happy to help. Kelsey can be contact by email at: kelsey.

h precisionathletica. au or you can book to see her for a one-on-one below. Skinfold Assessments — why we use them and you should too. Who should have their skinfolds done?