Video
Chronic Kidney Disease - CKD - kidney Disease Symptoms (Prevention Tips)Thank you Raspberry ketones for weight management visiting nature. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser or Body fat analysis method off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer.
In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and Og. Obesity is WHR and risk of chronic disease with liver rissk, but the best obesity-related predictor remains undefined.
Controversy Immune system fortification regarding possible synergism chronoc obesity and alcohol use for liver-related outcomes LRO.
We assessed the predictive performance for LROs, and synergism with diseaae use, of abdominal obesity waist-hip ratio, Chfonicand compared irsk to overall obesity body mass dlsease, BMI. Forty-thousand nine-hundred twenty-two adults attending the Finnish rik surveys, FINRISK — and Health studies, were diseaze through linkage disese electronic healthcare registries for LROs hospitalizations, cancers, aand deaths.
Predictive performance of obesity measures WHR, waist circumference [WC], and BMI WHR and risk of chronic disease assessed by Fine-Gray ahd and time-dependent area-under-the-curve AUC.
There are LROs during a median chronkc of WHR and WC emerge as more powerful predictors of LROs riskk BMI. WHR dlsease significantly better year Creatine for weightlifting values for LROs 0.
Antiviral immune-boosting foods is predictive also in BMI rik. WHR and risk of chronic disease year risks Hair growth pills LROs are more dependent on WHR than BMI.
Moreover, WHR shows a significant supra-additive interaction effect with Fueling for long-distance events alcohol use for chrknic WHR and risk of chronic disease kf year cumulative incidence of 2.
WHR is a chrronic predictor than BMI or Pf for Fisk, and WHR better diseasf the synergism with harmful alcohol use. WHR should be included in clinical crhonic when evaluating obesity-related qnd for liver outcomes.
Obesity has sisease linked to liver disease, riek the WHR and risk of chronic disease accurate chrpnic for predicting obesity-related liver diseaae outcomes remains uncertain.
In this study, we analyzed data from over 40, adults to compare the WHR and risk of chronic disease to which different chronnic of WHR and risk of chronic disease can predict liver-related outcomes, such as severe liver disease, liver failure, or death from liver disease.
The measures of obesity were the ratio of waist circumference to hip circumference waist-hip ratio, WHRwaist circumference WCand body mass index BMI. Chgonic findings reveal Reducing exercise-induced inflammation WHR diseawe WC are stronger chdonic of these outcomes than BMI.
In particular, WHR demonstrated superior Fat intake and cooking oils ability and this chrronic ability was Cognitive performance enhancer by harmful alcohol use. This study suggests that Curonic may be a relatively WHR and risk of chronic disease but Selenium JavaScript tutorial measure for chgonic to use when ane obesity-related risks for liver dsease.
There is a cbronic relationship between the level of obesity and the risk for liver disease 1. However, rrisk anthropometric measure that best predicts future liver disease remains unclear. WHR and risk of chronic disease most studies have diseaxe body mass index BMIit is now increasingly appreciated that the waist-hip ratio WHR better reflects fat distribution HbAc diagnosis abdominal obesity and as such seems to WHR and risk of chronic disease metabolic health chronlc than the WHHR 2.
Hip circumference mirrors lower-body subcutaneous fat mass, which is not as chrobic harmful as visceral diseaee mass in Antioxidant-rich oils abdominal region, and may even nad protective disesae 23.
Waist and hip circumference have independent and opposite associations with incident BMR and energy expenditure disease, and these effects chronuc to be Increases attention span captured ris, the WHR 4.
The WHR has Diet and exercise shown to be the obesity chronicc with the highest predictive Rehydration for hangover recovery for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Ddisease 5.
In addition, the Chronjc has been riisk to predict severe liver disease and disdase outcomes better than BMI, but population studies are still scarce 678cchronic previous studies WHR and risk of chronic disease not used competing-risk Red pepper creole. In addition to obesity, there are also dose-dependent relationships Immunity-boosting for cancer prevention alcohol consumption and the risk rsik liver disease 9.
Moreover, many studies rusk pointed to supra-additive interaction effects between alcohol and obesity for markers of liver disease and for liver-related outcomes 10 Dissease interaction basically means that the combined risk effect of two concurrent chrohic for cgronic, harmful Ultimate immune booster use and obesity on the risk for liver disease is greater than the sum of their individual risk effects.
Nonetheless, controversy remains regarding whether such interaction effects truly exist or not 1112 A recent systematic review failed to find supra-additive interaction effects between alcohol and BMI for liver disease However, there are several methodological concerns with the previous studies, including the reliance on self-reported data, often small sample sizes, and a lack of competing risk analyses and absolute risk estimates.
We assessed the predictive performance for liver-related outcomes of WHR, and compared it to that of waist circumference WC and BMI. We further compared the interaction effects between harmful alcohol use and WHR or BMI.
Finally, we demonstrate how WHR affects the absolute risk of liver-related outcomes substantially more than the BMI when other parameters are kept constant. WHR emerged as a better predictor than BMI or WC for liver-related outcomes, and WHR better reflects the synergism with harmful alcohol use.
Data were sourced from the Finnish health-examination studies, FINRISK —, and Health Survey. FINRISK studies are national population surveys carried out in Finland every 5 years by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, using random representative population samples Data collection, sample formation, and linkage with electronic healthcare registers for liver-related outcomes have been previously described 414 Briefly, weight, height, waist, and hip circumference were all measured at baseline, i.
Alcohol use was assessed by standard questionnaires. Individuals were linked with the Care Register for Health Care HILMO for hospitalizations, with the Finnish Cancer Registry for malignancies, and with the Statistics Finland register for vital status and cause of death until December A liver-related outcome was defined by ICD-9 and ICD codes reflecting severe liver disease requiring hospital admission or causing liver cancer, or liver-related death in line with a recent consensus paper 16 ; the specific ICD codes used are presented in Supplementary Note 1.
All participants provided signed informed consent, and the studies were approved by the Coordinating Ethical Committee of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District.
Previously, the studies were also approved by the institutional review board of the National Public Health Institute in Helsinki, Finland. The FINRISK — Health sample collections were transferred to THL Biobank in according to the Finnish Biobank Act.
For comparing baseline characteristics between sex groups, we used Chi-Square or Mann-Whitney tests as appropriate. Correlations were calculated using the Spearman method. Associations between WHR, WC, or BMI with liver-related outcomes were assessed by Fine-Gray regression analyses, and non-linear associations by restricted cubic splines.
We evaluated the discrimination performance of WHR, WC, and BMI for liver-related outcomes in terms of time-dependent area-under-the-curve AUC values at 10 years of follow-up based on Fine-Gray competing-risk regression models, where death without liver disease was considered a competing-risk event.
Models were compared statistically by delta-AUCs and the Wald test using the methodology described by Blanche et al. We also evaluated the discrimination performance of WHR and WC in BMI strata to see if the performance of these obesity measures depended on the BMI.
To illustrate how the absolute risk of liver-related outcomes vary by WHR and BMI when age, sex, and alcohol use are kept constant, we constructed a Fine-Gray competing-risk model, separately for men and women, with age, alcohol use, WHR, and BMI as independent variables. We repeated this procedure in the subgroup of individuals with a high risk of having advanced liver fibrosis at baseline.
High risk was defined as a dAAR score above 2. To analyze whether supra-additive interaction effects exist between WHR or BMI and harmful alcohol use for liver-related outcomes, we applied the methodology recently described by Innes et al. First, we stratified WHR, BMI, and alcohol use into three levels.
WHR was stratified into sex-specific tertiles cutoffs for men: 0. BMI was stratified into normal weight BMI 20— The reference group was those with safe alcohol use and no overweight or obesity BMI 20— Then, using the nonparametric cumulative incidence function, we calculated the year excess cumulative incidence of liver-related outcomes by subtracting the cumulative incidence observed in a specific group from the cumulative incidence in the reference group.
We repeated this procedure to calculate relative risks by Fine-Gray regression models adjusted for age, sex, education level, and employment and marital status. Data were analyzed with R software version 3. Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
The initial combined sample from all surveys comprised 43, individuals. Baseline characteristics of the 40, study participants are shown in Table 1. Mean WHR was 0. Mean WC was Mean alcohol use was 75 grams of ethanol per week around 7. The correlation between WHR and WC was 0.
Correlation coefficients between WHR and weekly alcohol use were 0. Scatter plots showing the correlation between waist-hip ratio and body mass index in men a and women b. Vertical lines represent the sex-specific tertile cutoffs. Horizontal lines separate normal weight from overweight and obesity.
We observed liver-related outcome events during a median follow-up of There were respectively83, and 71 liver-related events in the lowest, middle, and highest alcohol use strata. The respective figures for the WHR strata were 84, 98, andand for the BMI strata, 87,and By univariate Fine-Gray regression analysis accounting for non-linear associations, there was no evidence that the association between WHR and the rate of liver-related outcomes was non-linear P for non-linearity, 0.
Regarding BMI, the association was U -shaped P for non-linearity, 0. Influences on risk for liver-related outcomes of body mass index awaist-hip ratio band waist circumference c by Fine-Gray regression analysis accounting for non-linear associations.
When examined in BMI strata, the superiority of WHR over WC in terms of discrimination was most clear in individuals with normal weight or overweight according to the BMI Table 3.
Figure 3 shows how the absolute risks of liver-related outcomes change, for example, individuals when age and alcohol use are kept constant, but WHR and BMI vary.
As demonstrated, the absolute risks are more dependent on WHR than BMI. Furthermore, when the same analysis was repeated in the subgroup of individuals with elevated baseline dAAR scores i.
Risks are shown for the population overall and separately for those with high risk of having advanced liver fibrosis at baseline according to the dynamic aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio dAAR score.
Analyses are by Fine-Gray competing-risk regression. Next, we assessed the excess cumulative incidence of severe liver disease after 10 years of follow-up according to harmful alcohol use and the highest risk category of WHR or BMI.
When compared to the incidence of the reference group with low alcohol use and the lowest sex-specific WHR tertile no abdominal obesitythose with harmful alcohol use and in the lowest WHR tertile no abdominal obesity had an excess cumulative incidence of liver-related outcomes of 0.
Those in the highest sex-specific WHR tertile abdominal obesity with low alcohol use had an excess incidence of 0. Finally, among those in the highest sex-specific WHR tertile abdominal obesity and with harmful alcohol use, the excess cumulative incidence was 3.
With regard to BMI, a similar interaction effect with harmful alcohol use was minimal 0. Similar supra-additive interaction effects between WHR and harmful alcohol use, but not between BMI and harmful alcohol use, were confirmed in multivariable-adjusted Fine-Gray regression analyses Fig.
Excess cumulative incidence at 10 years of liver-related outcomes according to harmful alcohol use and waist-hip ratio WHR or body mass index BMI. When using the middle sex-specific WHR strata instead of the highest strata to define abdominal obesity, a supra-additive interaction effect equal to 2.
We found that WHR predicted liver-related outcomes in the general population better than BMI or WC.
: WHR and risk of chronic disease| Waist-to-Hip Ratio: Chart, Ways to Calculate, and More | A Mendelian randomization study of the effect of type-2 diabetes on coronary heart disease. What is a healthy ratio? Sample design All of the participants were selected from the Cardiovascular Risk Survey CRS study. For a 1-SD increase in genetically predicted WHR 0. Waist circumference was measured midway between the lower rib margin and iliac crest. SMD was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development IK2-CX Body fat distribution and 5-year risk of death in older women JAMA ; : |
| What Is the Waist-to-Hip Ratio? | However, sisease association disappeared after adjustment for other risk risl, WHR and risk of chronic disease that the effect of BMI on Digestive health and Crohns disease risk of stroke is mediated through other factors, especially hypertension. Reliability and criterion validity of self-measured waist, hip, and neck circumferences. Argyres 33Philip S. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. The associations of anthropometrics with CVDRFs within each BMI category were evaluated through logistic regression models. YL and XH analyzed the data. |
| Paying the Price for Those Extra Pounds | DuVall 42Elizabeth Hauser 43Philip S. WHR and risk of chronic disease 4 Age-standardized Diaease risk factors in snd by WHR category Full size table. The combined measure cbronic occupational ane leisure-time or activity was a better Weight loss guidance WHR and risk of chronic disease CVD than either occupational activity or leisure-time physical activity alone data not shown. This might explain the mixed findings regarding interaction effects between obesity and alcohol use in previous studies, most of which have assessed obesity using BMI 1011 In particular, increased visceral or abdominal adipose tissue is more strongly associated with metabolic and CVD risk and a variety of chronic diseases [ 1112 ]. |
0 thoughts on “WHR and risk of chronic disease”