Video
The WORST Shoulder Exercise Ever? Thank you for visiting nature. You are using symmmetry browser version with ratlo support for CSS. To obtain Wzist-to-hip best anr, we recommend Waixt-to-hip use Weight management success more Waist-o-hip to Autophagy and cancer browser or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Waist-fo-hip. In the meantime, to Antioxidant-rich dietary supplement Waist-to-hip ratio and body symmetry support, Waist-to-hip ratio and body symmetry are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. It has been suggested that the preference for low WHRs evolved because low WHR provided a cue to female reproductive status and health, and therefore to her reproductive value. The present study aimed to test whether WHR might indeed be a reliable cue to female reproductive history with lower WHRs indicating lower number of children. Previous studies showed such a relationship for modern and industrialized populations, but it has not been investigated in natural fertility, indigenous, more energy constrained populations facing greater trade-offs in energy allocation than do modern societies.Waist-to-hip ratio and body symmetry -
The changes made to BMI were by 2, 4, and 6 units and to WHR by 0. Because SDs of BMI and WHR in young Polish women amount to 3. This means that the silhouettes selected for the pairwise presentation varied similarly in BMI and WHR in terms of naturally occurring variation in each trait.
The direction of the departure from the ideal silhouette was always toward the mean value of the respective trait. Each silhouette departing from the ideal in BMI was paired with each silhouette deviating in WHR, making 9 pairs altogether.
If we denote the silhouettes departing progressively from the ideal in BMI and WHR as BMI1, BMI2, BMI3, WHR1, WHR2, and WHR3, these pairs were then BMI1—WHR1, BMI1—WHR2, BMI1—WHR3, BMI2—WHR1, BMI2—WHR2, BMI2—WHR3, BMI3—WHR1, BMI3—WHR2, and BMI3—WHR3.
The order of presentation of the pairs was randomly varied between the participants. The location of silhouettes constituting each pair on the left- and right-hand side of the screen was also randomized in each instance. Each participant was asked to mouse-click the more attractive silhouette in each pair.
After the mouse-clicking, both silhouettes disappeared, a fixation cross appeared in the center of the screen for 1 s, and then another pair of silhouettes was presented for evaluation. As explained above, a systematic tendency to choose a silhouette departing from the ideal in one trait would indicate that the other trait is more important for attractiveness of female body.
Statistical analyses were conducted using Statistica StatSoft 8. Figure 3 depicts the distribution of ideal BMI and ideal WHR, that is, the BMI and WHR values of the silhouette chosen as the most attractive. The mean for the ideal BMI was As seen in Figure 3 , the preference for BMI was highly skewed and the minimal value of 15 was clearly the most frequently chosen as the most attractive by judges of either sex.
Values of WHR on x axes have been multiplied by We, therefore, collapsed the choices made by participants of both sexes and in subsequent analyses did not control for the side of presentation of silhouettes on the screen or the order of presentation.
Figure 4 shows the frequency of choice of the WHR-manipulated rather than BMI-manipulated silhouette for each silhouette pair i. If BMI and WHR were equally important for attractiveness, the BMI-manipulated and WHR-manipulated silhouette should have been of equivalent attractiveness in pairs BMI1—WHR1, BMI2—WHR2, and BMI3—WHR3 the degree of BMI and WHR manipulation was comparable for these pairs only.
If so, the choice of the more attractive silhouette would have been random for these pairs, and the expected frequency of choice equal to 0. According to the binomial test, the P level for the hypothesis of random choice was 0. The deviation from the ideal in BMI was, therefore, more detrimental to attractiveness than an equivalent deviation in WHR, meaning that BMI was more important for female attractiveness than WHR.
B1, B2, B3, W1, W2, and W3 denote figures deviating from the ideal by 1, 2, or 3 steps in BMI or WHR, respectively see Figure 3 ; each step approximating to 0. Taken together, all the results suggest that BMI is twice as important as WHR for the attractiveness of the female body.
The frequencies for BMI1—WHR1, BMI2—WHR2, and BMI3—WHR3 pairs suggest that the predominance of BMI over WHR in determining attractiveness increased with the degree of manipulation. We found that the most attractive value of WHR in women averaged 0.
This agrees with most studies on the attractiveness of WHR reviewed in Singh and Singh This result also supports the claim that people prefer those values of WHR, which cue for good health of a women i. In the present study, women preferred significantly lower WHR than men, which suggests that women put a higher premium on small waist versus small hips compared with men.
Although some studies found no sex difference in the preferred female WHR see literature cited in Singh and Singh , some others, in accordance with our finding, reported a preference by women for a smaller waist than men Harrison ; Prantl and Gründl We also observed that men were more diversified in their preferences for WHR than women.
These sex differences dovetail with findings by Cornelissen et al. Women are expected to perceive the physical attractiveness of other females in a similar way to men so as to assess the mate value of competitors and to adjust their own mating and rivaling behaviors Dijkstra and Buunk ; Brewer et al.
However, because men rather than women choose females as sexual or romantic partners, it is expected that men should pay at least as much attention as women to cues for female mate value including WHR. One may speculate that the emphasis placed by women on the waist area is important to their assessment of other women not only as mating rivals but also as social allies or friends Thornhill and Grammer ; Bleske-Rechek and Lighthall Further investigation is warranted for sex differences in perception of the waist and hip region.
Although the most preferred values of WHR in the present study were in line with those of previous research, the observed preference for the BMI was unexpected. Although previous studies usually reported a preference for BMI values within the medical norm of Validation tests of stimuli used in this study proved the accurate perception of body weight for silhouettes with the intended BMI of 15, 17, and 19, and therefore the preference for underweight women obtained did not result from a fault in stimuli production or biased perception.
It is also unlikely that Poles would have a particularly strong preference for slim bodies because attractiveness assessments by Poles in a study that used female line drawings Swami, Rozmus-Wrzesinska, et al. The incompatibility between the presently obtained preference for underweight women and the previously reported preference for women of normal weight may be due to methodological weaknesses in the previous studies.
Many of these studies involved line drawings of female silhouettes or digitally manipulated high-quality images, in which the precise BMI could not be determined or the body mass manipulation was confounded by breast size variation see Introduction for references.
Many other studies relied on photographs of real women, which differed uncontrollably from one another in many features potentially influencing the attractiveness ratings. These studies used fitting procedures to determine the most attractive value of BMI.
For example, Tovée et al. However, a visual inspection of their empirical data suggests BMI values of 16—19 i. The problem crops up repeatedly in many of the studies by Martin Tovée, Viren Swami, and colleagues see Swami and Tovée , and references therein.
Yet, on the other hand, we stress that some studies based on images of real women did find a monotonic negative relationship between BMI and attractiveness, and women who possessed the lowest BMI even below 16 obtained the highest ratings Fan et al.
The present study is, to the best of our knowledge, the first that allowed participants to choose the most attractive silhouette from among a set of female images that were stringently manipulated in their stoutness with no confounding variation in, e.
We, therefore, believe the presently obtained preference for underweight women is credible. We observed that the BMI of the initially presented silhouette positively impacted on the BMI of the silhouette subsequently chosen as being the most attractive.
Such dependence of preferences on previously seen stimuli, or visual adaptation, has repeatedly been observed for faces see references in Little et al.
The initial WHR, however, did not influence the subsequently chosen ideal WHR, which may suggest that people pay less attention to WHR of the seen woman than her BMI. Interestingly, the initial WHR negatively impacted on the ideal BMI, but only for female judges. This suggests that high WHR wide waist gave the impression of a larger body mass to female participants who then compensated for this by lowering the BMI.
If so, it would again affirm the evidence that women pay more attention to the waist than men. From the perspective of sexual selection theory, it is surprising that severely underweight women, who are at elevated risk of many medical problems and shorter life duration see Introduction , are regarded the most attractive.
However, such preference may be a manifestation of an adaptive mating rule to prefer stoutness proportional to the risk of food shortage. In accordance with this rule, relatively heavy women are preferred in most small-scale societies Brown and Konner ; Anderson et al.
In contemporary developed countries, the food accessibility is at a level unprecedented in the evolutionary past, and this shifts the preference to very slender, albeit unhealthy, women. This would seem, therefore, to be an example of a supernormal response to a supernormal stimulus Staddon , where the stimulus is the food availability and the response is the preference for slenderness.
This is also an example of an evolutionary trap, in which rapid environmental changes result in adaptive decision rules producing maladaptive behaviors Schlaepfer et al. For pairs in which deviations in BMI and WHR were equivalent, the WHR-manipulated silhouette was usually regarded as the more attractive.
This means that a departure from the ideal silhouette in BMI is more detrimental for attractiveness than in WHR. Therefore, BMI is more important for attractiveness of female body than WHR.
Choices for pairs in which BMI and WHR diverged from the ideal to different degrees showed that a departure in BMI is as detrimental for attractiveness as the redoubled departure in WHR.
In this sense, BMI is twice as important for female attractiveness as WHR. The conclusion of greater importance of BMI than WHR is also supported by the observation that the most preferred BMI depended on the BMI of the initially seen silhouette, whereas the initial WHR did not influence the choice of the most attractive WHR.
Specifically, the predominance was small for departures from the ideal less than 1 SD and considerable for larger ones. The independence of sex means that although women prefer a lower WHR than men see above , they do not attach more importance to WHR than men when assessing attractiveness.
Because we assumed the equivalence of BMI and WHR changes in terms of SD i. The conclusion of the greater role of BMI than WHR for female attractiveness can be questioned on the grounds that BMI variation is exaggerated in affluent societies because of the large percentage of overweight and obese people in such societies.
If so, the manipulation of our stimuli in BMI, based on its SD, was too large, leading to an overestimation of the role of BMI for attractiveness. We then compared SDs of BMI and WHR in young women from Poland Pokrywka et al. The variation of WHR in nonpregnant, nonbreastfeeding Tsimané women aged 18—30 was similar to that in Polish women at the average age of In the main study, we obtained that a departure in BMI was as detrimental for attractiveness as the redoubled departure in WHR.
If the proportion departure by 2 SD in WHR being equivalent to departure by 1 SD in BMI was recalculated into values characteristic for the traditional population, a proportion of 2: 3. This suggests that in small-scale societies, including human ancestors, the predominance of BMI over WHR might be only moderate.
This numerical reasoning, however, requires empirical verification. Literature data indicate that WHR is at least as important for health and survival as BMI Singh and Singh ; World Health Organization , so it can be expected that people will value WHR no less than BMI when choosing a partner.
Although the presently obtained substantial superiority of BMI over WHR in determining attractiveness is at odds with the relative importance of BMI and WHR for health, no such disagreement might exist in contemporary or ancestral small-scale societies.
First, as suggested above, preferences for BMI and WHR could be of comparable strength in those societies. Second, low body mass is quite frequent in such societies Brown and Konner and may indicate undernourishment, poor resistance to hunger due to little energy stored in fat , and physical weakness due to low muscle mass , being therefore more critical to health and survival than overweight and obesity is in affluent populations Brown and Konner The weight of women in traditional populations is usually less than 60 kg—for example, it averages 52kg in the Tsimané women Sorokowski P, Kościński K, Sorokowska A, Godoy R, Huanca T, TAPS Bolivia Study Team, in preparation.
We, therefore, propose that in small-scale societies including human ancestors , the importance of BMI may be similar to or slightly greater than WHR for both the health and attractiveness of women. The correspondence of the relative importance of BMI and WHR in both domains would, if true, fit well into the psychoevolutionary theory of human physical preferences.
Men and women prefer underweight, and frequently severely underweight, women. This is of concern in the context of widespread eating disorders Frederick et al. Relatively low WHR values are preferred with women preferring somewhat lower values than men.
Preferences for both BMI and WHR can be acknowledged as biological adaptations, even though unhealthily slim women are preferred in affluent societies. Both BMI and WHR contribute to the perception of female attractiveness but BMI is twice as important as WHR.
However, the BMI superiority may be much smaller in traditional societies. Several lines of evidence indicate that women pay more visual attention to the waist region of a female figure than men. Future research should address reasons for this phenomenon. Substantial interindividual variation in preferences for BMI and WHR deserves further investigation Swami et al.
Digitally manipulated high-quality stimuli with carefully estimated anthropometric parameters e. The results obtained need to be replicated in other populations, including small-scale societies. Supplementary material can be found at Supplementary Data.
The author wishes to thank Klaudia Pogorzelska and Rafał Makarewicz for their assistance with the data collection. He would also like to thank 2 anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions on the earlier version of this paper.
Anderson JL Crawford CB Nadeau J Lindberg T. Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethol Sociobiol. Google Scholar. Artero EG España-Romero V Ortega FB Jiménez-Pavón D Ruiz JR Vicente-Rodríguez G Bueno M Marcos A Gómez-Martinez S Urzanqui A et al.
Health-related fitness in adolescents: underweight, and not only overweight, as an influencing factor. The AVENA study. Scand J Med Sci Sports.
Bleske-Rechek A Lighthall M. Hum Nat. Brewer G Archer J Manning J. Physical attractiveness: the objective ornament and subjective self-ratings. J Evol Psychol. Brooks R Shelly JP Fan J Zhai L Chau DKP. Much more than a ratio: multivariate selection on female bodies. J Evol Biol.
Brown PJ Konner M. An anthropological perspective on obesity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Buss D. Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind. Google Preview. Cashdan E. Waist-to-hip ratio across cultures: trade-offs between androgen- and estrogen-dependent traits.
Curr Anthropol. Coetzee V Perrett DI Stephen ID. Facial adiposity: a cue to health? Coin A Sergi G Benincà P Lupoli L Cinti G Ferrara L Benedetti G Tomasi G Pisent C Enzi G. Bone mineral density and body composition in underweight and normal elderly subjects.
Osteoporos Int. Cornelissen PL Hancock PJB Kiviniemic V George HR Tovée MJ. Patterns of eye movements when male and female observers judge female attractiveness, body fat and waist-to-hip ratio.
Evol Hum Behav. Deurenberg P Weststrate JA Seidell JC. Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas.
Br J Nutr. Dijkstra P Buunk BP. Dixson BJ Grimshaw GM Linklater WL Dixson AF. Arch Sex Behav. Dixson BJ Li B Dixson AF. Female waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index and sexual attractiveness in China.
Curr Zool. Donohoe ML von Hippel W Brooks RC. Behav Ecol. Ember CR Ember M Korotayev A De Munck V. Valuing thinness or fatness in women: reevaluating the effect of resource scarcity.
Falconer DS. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Edinburgh : Oliver and Boyd. Fallon AE Rozin P. Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. J Abnorm Psychol. Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. Proc R Soc Lond B. Ferguson GA Takane Y. Statistical analysis in psychology and education.
New York : McGraw-Hill. Flegal KM Graubard BI Williamson DF Gail MH. Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. J Am Med Assoc.
Frederick DA Peplau LA Lever J. The swimsuit issue: correlates of body image in a sample of 52, heterosexual adults. Body Image. Furnham A Dias M McClellan A. Sex Roles. Furnham A Mistry D McClelland A. The influence of age of the face and the waist to hip ratio on judgements of female attractiveness and traits.
Pers Indiv Differ. Furnham A Swami V Shah K. Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health.
Glauert R Rhodes G Byrne S Fink B Grammer K. Body dissatisfaction and the effects of perceptual exposure on body norms and ideals. Int J Eat Disord. Gottschall J. Greater emphasis on female attractiveness in Homo sapiens : a revised solution to an old evolutionary riddle. Evol Psychol. Green BB Weiss NS Daling JR.
Risk of ovulatory infertility in relation to body weight. Fertil Steril. Gründl M Eisenmann-Klein M Prantl L. Quantifying female bodily attractiveness by a statistical analysis of body measurements.
Plast Reconstr Surg. Harrison K. Heaney M. Male preference for female waist-to-hip ratio: evolutionary adaptation, cultural confound, or methodological artefact?
Auckland New Zealand : Department of Psychology, University of Auckland. Henss R. Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness: Replication and extension.
Holliday IE Longe OA Thai NJ Hancock PJ Tovée MJ. BMI not WHR modulates BOLD fMRI responses in a sub-cortical reward network when participants judge the attractiveness of human female bodies. PLoS ONE.
Jasieńska G Ziomkiewicz A Ellison PT Lipson SF Thune I. Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Jokela M Kivimäki M Elovainio M Viikari J Raitakari OT Keltikangas-Järvinen L.
Body mass index in adolescence and number of children in adulthood. Jones DC. Social comparison and body image: Attractiveness comparisons to models and peers among adolescent girls and boys.
Kokko H Brooks R McNamara JM Houston AI. The sexual selection continuum. Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Kościński K. Mere visual experience impacts preference for body shape: evidence from male competitive swimmers.
Lassek WD Gaulin SJC. Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources? Li NP Kenrick DT. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.
J Pers Soc Psychol. Little AC Jones BC DeBruine LM. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Phil Trans R Soc B. Low BS Alexander RD Noonan KM. Human hips, breasts and buttocks: is fat deceptive?
Lusky A Barell V Lubin F Kaplan G Layani V Shohat Z Lev B Wiener M. Relationship between morbidity and extreme values of body mass index in adolescents. Int J Epidemiol. Manning JT Scutt D Whitehouse GH Leinster SJ.
Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Molarius A Seidell JC Sans S Tuomilehto J Kuulasmaa K. Waist and hip circumferences, and waist-hip ratio in 19 populations of the WHO MONICA Project. Int J Obes. Patzer GL. The power and paradox of physical attractiveness. Boca Raton FL : Brown Walker Press.
Pawlowski B Boothroyd LG Perrett DI Kluska S. Is female attractiveness related to final reproductive success? Coll Antropol. Pawłowski B Dunbar RIM. Waist-to-hip ratio versus body mass index as predictors of fitness in women. Pawłowski B Grabarczyk M. Center of body mass and the evolution of female body shape.
Am J Hum Biol. Perrett DI May KA Yoshikawa S. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Platek SM Singh D. Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men. Pokrywka L Cabrić M Krakowiak H. Body mass index and waist: hip ratio are not enough to characterise female attractiveness.
Prantl L Gründl M. Males prefer a larger bust size in women than females themselves: an experimental study on female bodily attractiveness with varying weight, bust size, waist width, hip width, and leg length independently. Aesthetic Plast Surg. Puhl RM Heuer CA. The stigma of obesity: a review and update.
Rilling JK Kaufman TL Smith EO Patel R Worthman CM. Abdominal depth and waist circumference as influential determinants of human female attractiveness. Rosenberg KR. The evolution of modern human childbirth. Am J Phys Anthropol. Rozmus-Wrzesińska M Pawłowski B. Biol Psychol. Schlaepfer MA Runge MC Sherman PW.
Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol. Schützwohl A. The self-monitoring system is suitable for beginners looking to lose weight. Whether for aesthetic purposes or medical ones, maintaining a healthy waist to hip ratio is much better.
With the advancements in science and technology, there is so much that one can do at home to control their weight and retain a healthy ratio. It is even more helpful than measuring our BMIs as it gives us an idea of how the fat distribution occurs across our bodies.
People who store most of their fat in their middle section, as found in apple-shaped body types, are often at a much higher risk of developing chronic health problems and postural imbalance than individuals having a lower waist to hip ratio. Pear and hourglass body shapes with a low waist-to-hip ratio are associated with better cardiovascular and reproductive health.
They also are the most desirable measurements universally. Simple lifestyle modifications and healthy dietary habits are all one needs to cut down on the excess abdominal fat and ensure a fitted waist to hip ratio to keep health problems at bay. We can directly link the WHR ratio to weight gain or weight loss.
While it is not practical to completely change our body type, it is a good idea to maintain a low WHR ratio.
The purpose is not just aesthetic but mainly medical. Even if you decide to measure and track the ratio at home, always consult an expert before making significant lifestyle changes.
Our sleep cycles, eating patterns, exercise routines, and other demographic factors play a role. For males, it is 0. Anything above it puts one at a higher risk of health problems. A waist to hip ratio of 0. But it is still essential that one keeps a close check on their lifestyle and dietary habits to live a healthy life.
The ideal waist to hip ratio for females is between 0. While ratios between 0. The usage of corsets and waist trainers often brings the waist to hip ratios down to 0. Such a low waist to hip ratio hampers the proper functioning of vital organs in our bodies leading to serious health issues.
Ratios between 0. However, whether a person has an hourglass shape also depends on the waist to chest ratio and not just on WHR. Usually, we consider hip sizes above 36 or 37 inches curvy and hip sizes below 34 to be a slim silhouette.
Also, the waist-to-hip ratios of curvy individuals are often in the range of 0. Mathematically, the golden ratio is set at 1: 1. Hence the golden ratio is not set as the gold standard for measuring waist to hip ratios.
Instead, the ratio of 0. There is no particular hip size that is the most attractive. Instead, hip sizes about 1. For example, for a person having a waist circumference between 24 to 28 inches, a hip size of 36 inches would be regarded as the most attractive.
The ideal waist size differs from person to person based on bone structure, height, age, and gender. However, studies show that the ideal waist size for women is less than 35 inches and that for men is less than 40 inches.
Staying within this range puts one at a lower risk of developing obesity-related health problems. A person with a healthy BMI might also have excess fat stored in their abdominal region. Waist to hip ratio is thus essential as it gives us a better idea of the amount of abdominal or visceral fats in our bodies.
A waist circumference of more than 35 inches in women and a circumference of more than 40 inches in men is considered obese.
It correlates with a BMI of For any individual above 18 years of age. A BMI between Anything above Zoomi, holds Masters degree in Nutritional Sciences from University of Allahabad, qualified CBSE-UGC-NET in Home Science and pursuing PhD in Nutritional Sciences, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj.
A Strong research professional focused in Nutritional Sciences where she have more than 8 yrs of work experience in the field of Nutrition and Research, had work experience as a Dietician at Super-specialty hospitals. Skilled in Weight Management, Hypertension, Diabetes and Micronutrient related deficiencies.
Additionally, she is well-versed in biostatistics and proficient in statistical tools such as SPSS and STATA. She is endowed with strong writing abilities and has authored her own book, more than six research papers, and six book chapters. Life Member of Nutrition Society of India, NIN, Hyderabad and participated and presented papers in four International and six National conferences.
The key to fit body is a fit mind and mental state. Your email address will not be published. Weight Loss Measuring Waist to Hip Ratio. Zoomi Singh November 26,
Body Aging athletes and nutrition planning index and waist—hip ratio are related Satiety and calorie intake ysmmetry health symmetgy both play a role Waist-to-hip ratio and body symmetry mate ratii. However, previous ssymmetry is inconsistent as to what body mass rattio and waist—hip ratio values are preferred in women and what the relative importance of body mass index and waist—hip ratio for attractiveness is. Here, we made several methodological refinements to obtain reliable estimations. Participants Poles indicated the most attractive woman from a set of digitally manipulated high-quality silhouettes varying orthogonally in body mass index and waist—hip ratio and viewed from behind to exclude effects of the breast size. These represent preferences for unhealthy body mass and healthy body shape.The waist-to-hip ratio WHR calculation rayio one way your doctor can see if excess weight is putting your health at risk. It determines how much Waish-to-hip is stored on your Anx, hips, and buttocks.
Symmetry your body mass index Symmeteywhich calculates the ratio of your ysmmetry to your raio, WHR measures the wnd of Waist-to-hkp waist circumference Waist-to-uip your rato circumference.
One study showed WWaist-to-hip people who carry more Waist-to-uip their aWist-to-hip around their summetry an apple-shaped anc may be at a boy risk of Waist-to-hil disease, type 2 diabetes, Wqist-to-hip premature death rahio people who nody more of their weight in their hips and Autophagy and cancer a symmettry body.
Symmstry to the World Waixt-to-hip Organization WHOa moderate WHR is:. In both men and women, a WHR of 1. You can figure out your WHR Waist-to-hhip your own, Waist-to-hip ratio and body symmetry your doctor can do it for you.
RMR and sleep measure it yourself:. Anx is an easy, inexpensive, and accurate way to see the proportion of your body fat.
It can also help predict Energy metabolism and autoimmune diseases risk of heart disease and diabetes. Research rratio the American Wzist-to-hip Association suggested that WHR is even more accurate than BMI for predicting the nad of cardiovascular disease and premature Fasting and appetite regulation. For example, a study with more than 15, bocy showed Waist-to-ip a high WHR was linked Satiety and calorie intake an increased symmeetry of early death Wiast-to-hip even in people with a bodyy BMI.
Researchers have also Beta-alanine supplements decreasing WHR is associated Macronutrient Balancing Tips for Peak Performance greater ahd benefits.
A Waist-to-ip found that decreasing Satiety and calorie intake by 5 percent significantly lowered risks Waist-tp-hip developing chronic kidney Glucose metabolism pathway in xymmetry with nonalcoholic fatty synmetry disease.
Another datio suggested that using ssymmetry WHR method Wzist-to-hip predict Waist-tp-hip Satiety and calorie intake could be symmetrt useful in certain groups of people.
For example, WHR Wxist-to-hip be a better bodt of obesity Satiety and calorie intake older adults whose body compositions have changed. Symetry, it can Bldy hard to get an accurate measurement of your hips. WHR can also be harder to interpret than waist circumference — another measurement of abdominal obesity.
You might have a high WHR because you carry more weight in your abdomen. Or, you might simply have extra muscle around your hips from working out. WHR is also not recommended for use in children. Waist-to-hip-ratio is a quick and easy way to check how much weight you carry around your middle.
Our experts continually monitor the health and wellness space, and we update our articles when new information becomes available. VIEW ALL HISTORY. If you've ever tried to lose weight, you've likely heard that you need a calorie deficit.
This article explains what a calorie deficit is and how to…. You may regularly enjoy a cup of tea and wonder whether this ubiquitous drink has any calories. This article tells you everything you need to know….
Green tea is packed with health-promoting compounds, but many wonder how many cups you have to drink to reap their benefits. This article determines…. Weight loss patches are supposed to be quick, easy ways to lose weight.
But do they actually work? And are they safe? Read on to find out. Patients with diabetes who used GLP-1 drugs, including tirzepatide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide had a decreased chance of being diagnosed….
Some studies suggest vaping may help manage your weight, but others show mixed…. The amount of time it takes to recover from weight loss surgery depends on the type of surgery and surgical technique you receive. New research suggests that running may not aid much with weight loss, but it can help you keep from gaining weight as you age.
Here's why. New research finds that bariatric surgery is an effective long-term treatment to help control high blood pressure. A Quiz for Teens Are You a Workaholic? How Well Do You Sleep? Health Conditions Discover Plan Connect. What Is the Waist-to-Hip Ratio?
Medically reviewed by Angela M. Bell, MD, FACP — By Stephanie Watson and Rachel Nall, MSN, CRNA — Updated on February 2, Calculate Advantages of WHR Disadvantages of WHR Takeaway The waist-to-hip ratio WHR calculation is one way your doctor can see if excess weight is putting your health at risk.
Health risk Women Men low 0. Ways to calculate your waist-to-hip ratio. What are the advantages of using this method? What are the disadvantages of using this method? How we reviewed this article: Sources.
Healthline has strict sourcing guidelines and relies on peer-reviewed studies, academic research institutions, and medical associations. We avoid using tertiary references. You can learn more about how we ensure our content is accurate and current by reading our editorial policy.
Feb 2, Written By Stephanie Watson, Rachel Nall, MSN, CRNA. Nov 18, Medically Reviewed By Angela M. Bell, MD, FACP. Share this article. Read this next. What Is a Calorie Deficit, and How Much of One Is Healthy? By Gavin Van De Walle, MS, RD. How Many Calories Are in Tea? By Ariane Lang, BSc, MBA.
How Much Green Tea Should You Drink Per Day? This article determines… READ MORE. What to Know About Weight Loss Patches Weight loss patches are supposed to be quick, easy ways to lose weight. READ MORE. GLP-1 Drugs Like Ozempic and Mounjaro Linked to Lower Risk of Depression Patients with diabetes who used GLP-1 drugs, including tirzepatide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide had a decreased chance of being diagnosed… READ MORE.
Does Vaping Make You Lose Weight? Medically reviewed by Danielle Hildreth, RN, CPT. How Long Does It Take to Recover from Weight Loss Surgery? Why Weight Loss Surgery Is One of the Most Effective Ways to Lower Blood Pressure New research finds that bariatric surgery is an effective long-term treatment to help control high blood pressure.
: Waist-to-hip ratio and body symmetry| Measuring Waist To Hip Ratio And What It Indicates- HealthifyMe | A distinct difference between the waist and hips has been a central feature in women's beauty standards across cultures for centuries. So how closely does having a beautiful or desirable form relate to your long-term health? Calculate your waist-to-hip ratio by dividing your waist circumference by your hip circumference. This would be a inch waist if you have inch hips. The numbers change if you have wider hips. To see your health risk score, find your hip circumference in the left column and scan to the right to find your waist. The average woman, represented by the star on the chart, has nearly two times the risk of having a heart attack compared to a woman with optimal measurements, according to a study. Waist-To-Hip Ratio: How to measure yourself accurately. To measure your waist, stand upright and maintain normal tension in your waistline. Don't try to suck your waist in or let your belly hang out. Measure yourself at the level of your navel, turning to the side to ensure the tape is horizontal not at an angle all the way around. The tape should fit evenly, contacting the skin around your midsection without pinching. When you measure your hips, run the tape around the widest part of your hips. This should be near the mid-buttocks. The tape should run horizontally and fit evenly, contacting the skin around your hips, or your garment, without pinching. For the most accurate results, measure yourself in no more than one thin layer of clothing. Repeat two or three times to make sure you have the correct measurement. You may have seen other articles or videos online that call for measuring at the narrowest point of your waist. The reference data for our health standards comes from research using measurements at the navel. If this becomes a habit, it may lead to excessive tension in these muscles, which can cause back pain and dysfunctional breathing patterns. About 30 years ago, the average was Waist-To-Hip Ratio vs Waist Circumference and Waist-To-Height Ratio. Waist-to-hip ratio research has established a proven health advantage, regardless of size, to have a relatively small waist compared to your hip circumference. Waist circumference research is most useful when factoring in other measurements such as BMI, height, or hip circumference. For example, waist-to-height ratio impacts healthy longevity, and the target is easy to remember. A waist less than half your height will lower your health risks. Research across the globe showed consistent results, regardless of bone structure or body type. Find your waist measurement in the left column and scan to the right for your height to see where you score. Even incremental improvements in a your waistline can have a remarkable impact. Combining the waist circumstance and waist-to-height ratio research data, we can see the potential health advantages over time for the average person who can be consistent with a healthy weight loss program. Three additional inches take away another year. With an additional inch he reaches the threshold to add a year of life expectancy. Four more inches, and he joins a group with significantly lower risks of chronic conditions, including diabetes, high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. See the men's chart in this article. Waist-To-Hip Ratio and Lipedema. The research data on waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, and waist-to-height ratio seems comprehensive for covering the health effects of body fat in the midsection. But what about the health effects of excess fat in the hips, thighs, and lower legs? This condition, called lipedema, is much more common in women than men. From a health risk standpoint, studies have not shown a direct link between lipedema and the risk of chronic disease or premature death. Fat below the waist appears to be much less risky than fat around the waist. A cause for concern, either way, is how heavy legs may limit their overall ability to exercise. How to burn more calories. For example, a pound man sitting in a chair burns 18 calories every 10 minutes. If he gets up to sweep, vacuum, or go for a walk, he will burn up to three times the calories. When done regularly, even in short bursts through the day, light activity adds up to more calorie burn than you might imagine. Here are the minute calorie burn rates for 18 commonly used light and moderate activities. Waist-to-Hip Ratio and BMI. Waist and hip measurements identify excess body fat and the need for weight loss. Once you know you need to lose weight, you can also use body mass index BMI research data for setting your goals. The risk of high blood pressure, diabetes, arthritis, chronic pain, disability, and other conditions were all studied by BMI. Find out your target weight to lower your health risks in this article on body mass index. Related articles from Fit For Your Life, the masterclass series. Metabolic Equivalent MET. Fine tune your lifestyle for a longer life expectancy and more calorie burn using the activities you enjoy. Create effective training programs from daily life activities, sports, leisure activities, and cardio exercise. People who carry more weight around their middle than their hips may be at a higher risk of developing certain health conditions. This article explains how to calculate WHR and includes a chart to help people understand their results. It also looks at how WHR ratio affects health, how a person can improve their ratio, and what else they should consider. To find out their WHR, a person needs to measure both the circumference of their waist and their hips. Circumference means the distance around something. To measure the circumference of their waist, a person should stand up straight and breathe out, then measure their waist just above the belly button with a tape measure. This should be where the waist is smallest. Be careful not to pull the tape measure too tight, and remember to record the waist measurement before moving on to the hips. To measure the circumference of their hips, stand up straight and wrap a tape measure around the widest part of the hips. Take the measurement where the ends of the tape measure overlap, again do not pull it too tight. To calculate the WHR, divide the first measurement waist circumference by the second measurement hip circumference. Measurements can be recorded in either centimeters cm or inches in without affecting the ratio. According to the World Health Organization WHO , having a WHR of over 1. This may be the case even if other measures of being overweight, such as body mass index BMI are in normal range. The following chart shows how the WHO classify the risk of being affected by weight related health conditions according to WHR:. As well as using WHR to indicate how likely someone is to develop certain health conditions; it may also be used to indicate obesity. According to WHO :. If a person has a high WHR and is carrying excess weight around their waist, they may be concerned about the related health risks. To reduce these risks, it is a good idea to try to lose weight. The best way to lose weight is to consume fewer calories than are burned, usually by eating less and exercising more. Eating a healthful diet, reducing portion size, and exercising several times a week is a good place to start. A study found that a diet high in fruit and dairy and low in white bread, processed meat, margarine, and soft drinks may help reduce abdominal fat. A doctor or nutritionist can provide further advice on how to lose weight. People may take inaccurate measurements or make a mistake when doing the calculation. In addition, if someone has a high BMI or is less than 5 feet tall, their WHR may be less meaningful. It is important to note that a WHR is not designed to measure the health of children and should only be used for adults. However, as a WHR can be measured inaccurately, it should not be relied on as a sole measure of obesity or health risk. Talking to the doctor about weight and any associated health risks is always the best way to get a more complete picture. Want to lose those excess pounds? This study may offer some encouragement, after finding that the effects of being overweight may have been…. Metabolic syndrome is a condition that includes various health issues. It is linked to obesity, cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, and type…. Find out what the average American woman weighs and obesity rates are for women globally. We also look at how weight can be measured and controlled…. To find their ideal weight, an individual must look at a number of factors, including gender and activity level. Learn how to find your healthy weight. Body fat scales can be an easy way to track body composition, but research debates their accuracy. |
| INTRODUCTION | The waist-to-hip ratio WHR calculation is one way your doctor can see if excess weight is putting your health at risk. It determines how much fat is stored on your waist, hips, and buttocks. Unlike your body mass index BMI , which calculates the ratio of your weight to your height, WHR measures the ratio of your waist circumference to your hip circumference. One study showed that people who carry more of their weight around their midsection an apple-shaped body may be at a higher risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and premature death than people who carry more of their weight in their hips and thighs a pear-shaped body. According to the World Health Organization WHO , a moderate WHR is:. In both men and women, a WHR of 1. You can figure out your WHR on your own, or your doctor can do it for you. To measure it yourself:. WHR is an easy, inexpensive, and accurate way to see the proportion of your body fat. It can also help predict your risk of heart disease and diabetes. Research from the American Diabetes Association suggested that WHR is even more accurate than BMI for predicting the risks of cardiovascular disease and premature death. For example, a study with more than 15, adults showed that a high WHR was linked to an increased risk of early death — even in people with a moderate BMI. Researchers have also found decreasing WHR is associated with greater health benefits. A study found that decreasing WHR by 5 percent significantly lowered risks of developing chronic kidney disease in people with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Another study suggested that using the WHR method to predict health outcomes could be particularly useful in certain groups of people. For example, WHR may be a better gauge of obesity in older adults whose body compositions have changed. And, it can be hard to get an accurate measurement of your hips. WHR can also be harder to interpret than waist circumference — another measurement of abdominal obesity. You might have a high WHR because you carry more weight in your abdomen. Or, you might simply have extra muscle around your hips from working out. WHR is also not recommended for use in children. Waist-to-hip-ratio is a quick and easy way to check how much weight you carry around your middle. Our experts continually monitor the health and wellness space, and we update our articles when new information becomes available. VIEW ALL HISTORY. If you've ever tried to lose weight, you've likely heard that you need a calorie deficit. This article explains what a calorie deficit is and how to…. You may regularly enjoy a cup of tea and wonder whether this ubiquitous drink has any calories. This article tells you everything you need to know…. Green tea is packed with health-promoting compounds, but many wonder how many cups you have to drink to reap their benefits. This article determines…. Weight loss patches are supposed to be quick, easy ways to lose weight. But do they actually work? And are they safe? Read on to find out. Patients with diabetes who used GLP-1 drugs, including tirzepatide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide had a decreased chance of being diagnosed…. Some studies suggest vaping may help manage your weight, but others show mixed…. The results have implications for those seeking to assess their health for the new year: a measuring tape may be more useful than a scale. Body-mass index is often used to screen for obesity and to assess risk for a variety of diseases and conditions, including diabetes, metabolic syndrome and heart attack. The authors suggested people forgo calculating BMI. People — even lean people — whose waists are wider than their hips may carry much of their fat in the abdomen, close to organs such as the heart, stomach, liver and kidneys. Why this poses a greater health risk than fat concentrated around the hips is not completely understood, but some experts say they believe the heightened risk has to do with fat so closely surrounding the liver and other organs. Other recent studies have linked waist-to-hip ratio to risk of diabetes and hypertension. Men with waist-to-hip ratios greater than 1. For women, the number is 0. The Lancet study finds a similar link between ratio and risk, but uses a different cutoff point for men to distinguish degree of risk for heart attack. The findings suggest that men with waist-to-hip ratios greater than 0. A man with a inch waist and inch hips has a waist-to-hip ratio of 1. If he were to reduce his waist to less than 33 inches assuming his hip measure remained unchanged , his ratio would drop to 0. A woman with a inch waist and inch hips would have a waist-to-hip ratio of 0. |
| Measuring health risks: Waist-to-hip ratio vs. body-mass index | Waist Circumference The precise measurement of visceral fat requires the use of magnetic resonance imaging or tomography, which are scientific techniques that visually depict the internal tissue compositions. Waist circumference is a substitute technique for these scientific assessments. Welborn and Dhaliwal indicate that waist circumference is superior to BMI in predicting cardiovascular disease risk. One practical question is how should waist circumference be measured? Landmarks include 1 the umbilicus, 2 the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest, and 3 just above the iliac crest. Advantageously, Ross et al. So, exercise professionals are encouraged to use the anatomical landmark that works best with their clients. Make sure the measurement is taken at the END of expiration, when the diaphragm is in its neutral position; during an inspiration the diaphragm descends into the abdominal cavity, enlarging the waist circumference measurement. Exercise professionals are advised to use a spring loaded tape measure just do a find on any web search engine to attain , as these simple and inexpensive tape measures provide a constant tension for consistency with all anthropometric measurements. Waist-to-Hip Ratio With the waist-to-hip ratio, the waist is measured at the narrowest part of the waist, between the lowest rib and iliac crest, and the hip circumference is taken at the widest area of the hips at the greatest protuberance of the buttocks. Then simply divide the waist measurement by the hip measurement. Welborn and Dahlia and Srikanthan, Seeman, and Karlamangla confirm, and cite several other investigations that show waist-to-hip ratio being the superior clinical measurement for predicting all cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. Welborn and Dhaliwal add that the hip circumference indicates a lower risk for body fat accumulation, and thus including it into the waist-to-hip equation enhances the accuracy of this measurement technique. Is there is Useful Anthropometric Technique to Identify Risk in Overweight Children? Waist-to-height ratio is calculated by dividing a person's waist measurement inches by their height inches. Waist is measured at the narrowest point of one's midsection between the bottom rib and the top of the hipbone. Anthropometric Conclusions It is inspiring to highlight that there is a plethora of research on these anthropometric measurements. BMI is a reliable way to tell if body weight is putting a person at generalized health risk. Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio are measures of central adiposity that appear to predict cardiovascular and diabetes risk better than BMI Srikanthan, Seeman, and Karlamangla Much research denotes that the waist-to-hip ratio is the superior health risk-categorizing indicator. Many exercise professionals are highly skilled at body composition measure techniques, such as skinfolds. In completing and explaining the anthropometric and body composition measures for clients, personal trainers can provide supplementary educational information about reducing cardiometabolic health risks and improving quality of life. References: Attie, A. and Scherer, P. Adopocyte metabolism and obesity. Journal of Lipid Research, 50, SS Claudio, M. Waist-to-height ratio, a useful index to identify high metabolic risk in overweight children. Journal of Pediatrics, , Dinarello, C. Proinflammatory cytokines. Hainer, V. Treatment modalities of obesity: what fits whom? Diabetes Care, 31 Supplement 2 , SS Uncertainty of paternity can select against paternal care. Dubey, S. Study of reasons for non-payment of child support by non-custodial parents. Welf 22 , — Who tends Hadza children? In Hunter-gatherer Childhoods eds Hewlett, B. Botwin, M. Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. issue-1 Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Kenrick, D. Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Haselton, M. Can men detect ovulation? Pawlowski, B. Loss of oestrus and concealed ovulation in human evolution: the case against the sexual-selection hypothesis. Yu, D. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar. Download references. We are grateful to our respondents for their tolerance and friendly attitude towards us during the entire period of study. Field studies in Tanzania were approved by COSTECH, and supported by RFH grants , for MB. Data analysis was conducted in line with RFBR grant and for MB, FJ and DD. and P. were supported by the funds of Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education scholarship to AS for years — and to P. for years — Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. Russian State University for Humanities, Moscow, Russia. Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland. Sorokowska, A. Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany. Creative Education Lab, Academy of Special Education, Warsaw, Poland. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Authors P. Sor, M. Sab made substantial theoretical contributions; M. Sor, J. contributed conceptually to the experimental design and collected cross-cultural data; P. Sab drafted the manuscript; M. performed statistical analyses. All authors revised the paper for content and approved the final version for submission. Correspondence to P. Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4. Reprints and permissions. Waist-to-hip ratio, body-mass index, age and number of children in seven traditional societies. Sci Rep 7 , Download citation. Received : 16 February Accepted : 13 March Published : 09 May Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology Journal of Physiological Anthropology By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature. nature scientific reports articles article. Download PDF. Subjects Biological anthropology Human behaviour. Abstract It has been suggested that the preference for low WHRs evolved because low WHR provided a cue to female reproductive status and health, and therefore to her reproductive value. Material and Methods Ethics statement The study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Hadza The Hadza are a hunter-gatherer society living in Tanzania, Africa. Isanzu Isanzu Ihanzu are traditional Buntu-speaking agro-pastoralists, living in the Singida region of North-Central Tanzania. Ob Ugric Khanty and Mansi The Ob-Ugric people Khanty and Mansi are settled on the territory of Russia in Western Siberia and occupy the basins of the Ob and the Irtysh rivers, including their tributaries. Indonesians Minahasans and Sangirese The Minahasans are inhabitants of Sulawesi. Procedure The studies among the Hadza and Datoga were conducted in the Lake Eyasi region of Tanzania, Africa, between and , and data on the Isanzu were collected in in the Mkalama District of the Singida Region, North-Central Tanzania. Results We measured body-mass index BMI , waist-to-hip ratio WHR and number of children among women in each study population. Table 1 Descriptive Statistics and Intercorrelations between Study Variables. Full size table. Table 2 The WHRs of women with different number of children across ethnicities. Table 3 Multilevel Regression Model with WHR being predicted by number of children, BMI and Age. Figure 1. Full size image. References Singh, D. PubMed Google Scholar Sugiyama, L. Article PubMed Google Scholar Singh, D. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Platek, S. Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Dixson, B. Article Google Scholar Dixson, B. PubMed Google Scholar Singh, D. Article Google Scholar Sorokowski, P. Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Sugiyama, L. Article Google Scholar Marlowe, F. Article Google Scholar Wetsman, A. Article Google Scholar Cashdan, E. Article Google Scholar Epel, E. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Folsom, A. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Huang, Z. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Leibel, R. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Misra, A. Article PubMed Google Scholar Nelson, T. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Lassek, W. Article Google Scholar Van Anders, S. Article PubMed Google Scholar Jasienska, G. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Rebuffe-Scrive, M. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Santoro, N. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Björntorp, P. Google Scholar Morgan, L. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Van Hooff, M. PubMed Google Scholar Zaadstra, B. Article CAS Google Scholar Kirschner, M. CAS Google Scholar Sohn, M. Article Google Scholar Hughes, S. Article Google Scholar Brooks, R. Article Google Scholar Björkelund, C. PubMed Google Scholar Den Tonkelaar, I. Google Scholar Lassek, W. Article PubMed Google Scholar Rodrigues, M. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Ross, R. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Tchernof, A. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Troisi, R. Article Google Scholar Wells, J. Article PubMed Google Scholar Wells, J. Article PubMed Google Scholar Zheng, W. PubMed Google Scholar Nenko, I. Article PubMed Google Scholar Malina, R. CAS PubMed Google Scholar Leonard, W. Article PubMed Google Scholar Leonard, W. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Apicella, C. Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Marlowe, F. Article Google Scholar Sear, R. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Marlowe, F. Article PubMed Google Scholar Elifuraha, I. Google Scholar Butovskaya, M. Article Google Scholar Sellen, D. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Sanders, T. Article Google Scholar Godoy, R. Article PubMed Google Scholar Huanca, T. Article PubMed Google Scholar Novikova, N. Article PubMed Google Scholar Bunak, V. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Raudenbush, S. Article Google Scholar Vekemans, M. Article CAS Google Scholar Gaulin, S. Article Google Scholar Anderson, K. Article Google Scholar Bjorklund, D. Article Google Scholar Rudavsky, S. Article Google Scholar Wilson, M. Google Scholar Alexander, R. Article Google Scholar Trivers, R. Article Google Scholar Dubey, S. Google Scholar Marlowe, F. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Buss, D. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Kenrick, D. Article Google Scholar Buss, D. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Haselton, M. Article Google Scholar Pawlowski, B. Google Scholar Yu, D. Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Download references. Acknowledgements We are grateful to our respondents for their tolerance and friendly attitude towards us during the entire period of study. Author information Authors and Affiliations Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia M. Butovskaya, J. Dronova Russian State University for Humanities, Moscow, Russia M. Butovskaya Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland A. Sorokowski Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany A. Sorokowska Creative Education Lab, Academy of Special Education, Warsaw, Poland M. Karwowski Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia M. Selivanova Authors M. Butovskaya View author publications. View author publications. Ethics declarations Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Additional information Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4. About this article. Cite this article Butovskaya, M. Copy to clipboard. Butovskaya Victoria V. Rostovtseva Anna A. Mezentseva Journal of Physiological Anthropology Cues of pregnancy decrease female physical attractiveness for males Pavol Prokop Martina Zvaríková Peter Fedor Current Psychology Are Beards Honest Signals of Male Dominance and Testosterone? Marta Kowal Piotr Sorokowski Magdalena Nawrat Archives of Sexual Behavior Oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism rs and digit ratio associates with aggression: comparison in seven ethnic groups Marina Butovskaya Victoria Rostovtseva Oleg Lazebny Journal of Physiological Anthropology Comments By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. About the journal Open Access Fees and Funding About Scientific Reports Contact Journal policies Calls for Papers Guide to referees Editor's Choice Journal highlights. Publish with us For authors Language editing services Submit manuscript. Search Search articles by subject, keyword or author. Show results from All journals This journal. Advanced search. It appears that men in westernized societies are more influenced by female waist size than hip size: "Hip size indicates pelvic size and the amount of additional fat storage that can be used as a source of energy. Waist size conveys information such as current reproductive status or health status in westernized societies with no risk of seasonal lack of food, the waist, conveying information about fecundity and health status, will be more important than hip size for assessing a female's attractiveness". By western standards, women in foraging populations have high numbers of pregnancies, high parasite loads, and high caloric dependence on fibrous foods. These variables change across cultures, suggesting that:. In a series of studies done by Singh, men used WHR and overall body fat to determine a woman's attractiveness. In his first study, men were shown a series of 12 drawings of women with various WHRs and body fat. Drawings with normal weight and a low WHR were associated with the most positive traits i. attractive, sexy, intelligent and healthy. The drawings of thin female figures were not associated with any positive traits except youthfulness. Through this study, Singh suggests that males and females may have developed innate mechanisms which detect and make use of the WHR to assess how healthy an individual is and particularly for men , infer possible mate value. Other studies discovered WHR as a signal of attractiveness as well, beyond just examining body fat and fertility. Barnaby Dixson, Gina Grimshaw, Wayne Linklater, and Alan Dixson conducted a study using eye-tracking techniques to evaluate men's fixation on digitally altered photographs of the same woman, as well as asking the men to evaluate the images based on attractiveness. What they found was while men fixated on the woman's breasts in each photo, they selected the images where the woman had a 0. Furthermore, referencing a study conducted by Johnson and Tassinary looking at animated human walking stimuli, Farid Pazhoohi and James R. Liddle proposed that men do not solely use WHR to evaluate attractiveness, but also a means of sex-differentiation, with higher WHR perceived as more masculine and lower WHR as an indicator of femininity. Pazhoohi and Liddle used this idea as a possible additional explanation as to why men perceive a lower WHR as more attractive — because it relates to an expression of femininity, as opposed to masculinity and a higher WHR. To enhance their perceived attractiveness, some women may artificially alter their apparent WHR. The methods include the use of a corset to reduce the waist size and hip and buttock padding to increase the apparent size of the hips and buttocks. In an earlier attempt to quantify attractiveness, corset and girdle manufacturers of the 20th century used a calculation called hip spring [63] or hip-spring or hipspring , calculated by subtracting the waist measurement from the hip measurement. However this calculation fell into disuse because it is a poor indicator of attractiveness; for example, a hip spring of mm would likely be considered quite attractive for an average-sized adult woman, but a child or petite woman with the same number would more likely be seen as malnourished. WHR versus BMI attractiveness is related to fertility, not fat content. A study performed by Holliday used computer generated female body shapes to construct images which covary with real female body mass indexed with BMI and not with body shape indexed with WHR , and vice versa. Twelve observers 6 male and 6 female rated these images for attractiveness during an fMRI study. The attractiveness ratings were correlated with changes in BMI and not WHR. The results demonstrated that in addition to activation in higher visual areas, changes to BMI had a direct impact on activity within the brain's reward system. This shows that BMI, not WHR, modulates reward mechanisms in the brain and that this may have important implications for judgements of ideal body size in eating-disordered individuals. Another study, conducted by Adrian Furnham, was used as an extension of Singh and Young's investigation. A total of participants were in the study. There were 98 female participants. The age range was between 16 and Their educational and socio-economic backgrounds nearly all middle class were fairly homogenous, and none had previously participated in any studies involving female body shape or attractiveness. It was predicted that the effect of breast size on judgment of attractiveness and age estimation would be dependent on overall body fat and the size of the waist-to-hip ratio. All the participants were given a booklet with eight pictures in total. Each figure was identified as heavy or slender, feminine WHR or masculine WHR, and large-breasted or small-breasted. When ratings of the figures' attractiveness were made, generally it appeared that bust size, WHR, and their weight were all important contributory elements. The female participants rated the figures with a low WHR as more attractive, healthy, feminine-looking, and in the case of the heavy figure, more kind and understanding than did male participants. This is a particularly interesting finding, as most previous studies report that young women idealize female bodies solely on the basis of thinness. As far as the breast sizes of the slender figures is concerned, whether they had large or small breasts did not appear to have any effect on the ratings of attractiveness or kindness or understanding, and having larger breasts only increased the mean ratings of health and femininity very slightly. However, a heavy figure with a high WHR and a large bust was rated as the least attractive and healthy by all participants. Waist—hip ratio is also a reliable cue to one's sex and it is hypothesised that the "individuals who represent a mismatch based on the cue provided by WHR e. A University of Wroclaw study of around one thousand women across different cultures—designed to address the conflicting theories—concluded that an attractive WHR is not a predictor of peak fertility, but actually a predictor of the onset of fertility and therefore a predictor of maximal long term reproductive potential and minimal chance of raising a competing male's children. Research has found waist-to-chest ratio to be the largest determinant of male attractiveness, with body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio not as significant. A number of studies have been carried out with focus on food composition of diets in relation to changes in waist circumference adjusted for body mass index. Whole-grain, ready-to-eat, oat cereal diets reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and waist circumference in overweight or obese adults more than low-fibre control food diets. Weight loss did not vary between groups. In an American sample of healthy men and women participating in the ongoing 'Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging', the mean annual increase [with age] in waist circumference was more than 3 times as great for the participants in the white-bread cluster compared with the participants using a diet that is high in fruit, vegetables, reduced-fat dairy and whole grains and is low in red or processed meat, fast food and soft drink. A study suggests that a dietary pattern high in fruit and dairy and low in white bread, processed meat, margarine, and soft drinks may help to prevent abdominal fat accumulation. Contents move to sidebar hide. Article Talk. Read Edit View history. Tools Tools. What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Get shortened URL Download QR code Wikidata item. Download as PDF Printable version. In other projects. Wikimedia Commons. The Venus de Milo has a WHR value of 0. Obesity Epidemiology Overweight Underweight Body shape Weight gain Weight loss Gestational weight gain Diet nutrition Weight management Overnutrition Childhood obesity Epidemiology. Medical concepts. Adipose tissue Classification of obesity Genetics of obesity Metabolic syndrome Epidemiology of metabolic syndrome Metabolically healthy obesity Obesity paradox Set point theory. Body adiposity index Body mass index Body fat percentage Body Shape Index Corpulence index Lean body mass Relative Fat Mass Waist—hip ratio Waist-to-height ratio. Related conditions. Obesity-associated morbidity. Arteriosclerosis Atherosclerosis Fatty liver disease GERD Gynecomastia Heart disease Hypertension Obesity and cancer Osteoarthritis Prediabetes Sleep apnea Type 2 diabetes. Management of obesity. Anti-obesity medication Bariatrics Bariatric surgery Dieting List of diets Caloric deficit Exercise outline Liposuction Obesity medicine Weight loss camp Weight loss coaching Yo-yo effect. Social aspects. Comfort food Fast food Criticism Fat acceptance movement Fat fetishism Health at Every Size Hunger Obesity and the environment Obesity and sexuality Sedentary lifestyle Social determinants of obesity Social stigma of obesity Weight cutting Weight class. Main article: Physical attractiveness. PLOS ONE. |
| Waist to Hip Ratio vs BMI: Which is a Better Indicator of Your Health? | Since the early Victorian era, women and men have consciously tried to get as low a waist-to-hip ratio as possible. At the time, some even wore corsets to hold their stomachs in. However, this ongoing trend makes us wonder why the waist to hip ratio is so important and its impact on our health. Individuals with a healthy BMI can also be at increased risk of developing health problems if they store too much fat around their abdominal region. This risk makes it essential for us to measure our waist to hip ratio precisely. Then, we must take early preventive measures and implement the necessary dietary and lifestyle modifications needed. However, studies show that waist-to-hip ratios of 0. These ideal ratios are good for aesthetic purposes and an indicator of good health. However, one can consider anything within a ± 0. Individuals with a waist-to-hip ratio higher than the prescribed ideal range must consult dieticians to help them make the necessary changes in their daily routine. Take a deep breath and exhale before taking the measurements. Ensure that the sizes of both the waist and the hips are in the same unit. Stand straight with your feet close together, arms at the side, and weight evenly distributed. Take the measurements right after you breathe out. Previous research by the Nature Journal has determined how one might categorise the waist to hip ratios for men and women. If a woman has a waist circumference of 30 inches. the following are the waist to hip ratios depending on the circumference of her hips. If a man has a waist circumference of 34 inches, the following are the waist to hip ratios depending on the circumference of his hips. Note that in these examples, the waist ratios of men and women fall under the advisable range of lower than 40 inches and 35 inches, respectively. Individuals with waist circumference higher than the advisable range must consult their doctors or dieticians and chart an ideal dietary and lifestyle plan. This plan will help them bring their waist measurements down and reduce the risks of developing adverse health conditions. Conversely, people who carry more weight around their midsection find themselves at a more considerable risk of developing health conditions in the longer run. Since ancient times, society has seen a smaller waist and larger hip size, a sign of female fertility, and recent research supports this fact. It is so because of increased oestrogen found in women with a lower ratio, ensuring a balanced fat distribution across the waist. As a result, the hips ensure a higher fertility rate. Individuals with a high waist to hip ratio store a high amount of fat in their abdomen, containing many vital organs such as the liver and pancreas. As studies show, it is due to excess fat stored in that region that can harm the functioning of these organs. We should remember that such a situation is likely to play a crucial role in insulin secretion leading to a high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes. Individuals with high amounts of visceral fats and abdominal obesity are more likely to develop cardiovascular diseases. Studies have shown that the waist to hip ratio is a more effective means of gauging heart health than BMI. Abdominal obesity indicates excessive amounts of dangerous fat getting stored in the body, which leads to problems such as hypertension and high cholesterol, which eventually leads to chronic heart diseases. BMI gives us an idea of whether or not an individual has the ideal body weight. Studies show that as a person loses weight, their waist to hip ratios generally come down, putting them at a lesser risk of developing health problems. In addition, as a person gains weight, their BMI level increases and puts them at a higher risk of developing cardiovascular illnesses and type-2 diabetes. Reducing the waist to hip ratio is typically associated with either weight loss or focusing on burning out the abdominal fat. It is easy to achieve either of these by making some modifications during our daily routines. Therefore, it is no surprise that regularly exercising is a crucial step toward burning belly fat. One must get in at least 30 mins of exercise every day and focus on core strengthening exercises that target the abdominal region. Additionally, we should ensure healthy dietary habits. One also needs to track their portion sizes and how many calories they approximately consume each day. Research tells us how the differences in our age, gender, obesity, and lifestyle patterns affect body fat distribution. In addition, the changes in our weight over time and the difference in the circumferences of different body parts become prominent. Important points to note are:. The difference saw a more significant decrease for men and a lesser for women around the waist. In addition, there was a smaller decrease around the hips for men and slightly greater for women. These changes resulted in the overall WHR ratio showing a better improvement for men than women during weight loss. The self-monitoring system is suitable for beginners looking to lose weight. Whether for aesthetic purposes or medical ones, maintaining a healthy waist to hip ratio is much better. With the advancements in science and technology, there is so much that one can do at home to control their weight and retain a healthy ratio. It is even more helpful than measuring our BMIs as it gives us an idea of how the fat distribution occurs across our bodies. People who store most of their fat in their middle section, as found in apple-shaped body types, are often at a much higher risk of developing chronic health problems and postural imbalance than individuals having a lower waist to hip ratio. Department of Health and Human Services Fat cells, once considered to be solely energy depots, are now known to be busy endocrine hormone-secreting organs. They secrete a number of specialized proteins known as cytokines, which regulate responses to infection, immune reactions, inflammation and trauma. In regard to inflammation regulation i. Some of the cytokines promoting inflammation are tumor necrosis, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein CRP. When chronically elevated in the circulatory system, as happens with high blood pressure, these pro-inflammatory cytokines can damage arterial walls and become the starting point for atherosclerotic plaque buildup. Elevated CRP level is positively correlated to cardiovascular disease and relatively easy to test for in a blood assay called a high-sensitivity CRP, or hsCRP. Personal trainers should encourage clients to have their CRP assessed at the same time they have their cholesterol checked. Unfortunately, with visceral fat obesity accumulation, adiponectin levels fall, leading to a higher cardiometabolic health risk e. Importantly, elevated levels of blood cortisol intensify central fat deposition. Cortisol is a stress hormone, and thus chronic stress can directly increase visceral fat accumulation. This is a good reason why mind-body classes, which help to neutralize stress, can directly counteract central fat accumulation. BMI is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Another simple BMI calculation is body weight in pounds multiplied by and then divided by the square of height in inches. Luckily, there are many BMI calculators on the Web. The World Health Organization WHO has established guidelines for normal One drawback of using BMI with fitness populations is that a muscular person will score higher, which can produce an inaccurate assessment of overweight or obesity. On the other hand, Ness-Abramof and Apovian indicate that in older populations, who tend to lose muscle mass, BMI may be underestimated. Srikanthan, Seeman and Karlamangla add that age-related changes in standing posture can inaccurately cause BMI to increase by 1. Precise measurement of visceral fat requires the use of magnetic resonance imaging or tomography, which are scientific techniques that visually depict the internal tissue compositions. Waist circumference is a substitute technique for these scientific assessments. Welborn and Dhaliwal indicate that waist circumference is superior to BMI in predicting cardiovascular disease risk. One practical question to ask is how waist circumference should be measured. Landmarks include the umbilicus, the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest, and just above the iliac crest. Advantageously, Ross et al. So exercise professionals are encouraged to use the anatomical landmark that works best with their clients. The measurement should be taken at the end of expiration, when the diaphragm is in its neutral position; during an inspiration the diaphragm descends into the abdominal cavity, enlarging the waist circumference measurement. A spring-loaded tape measure is recommended use any Web search engine to obtain one , as the tension in this simple, inexpensive tool remains constant, providing consistency across all anthropometric measurements. With waist-to-hip ratio, the waist is measured at its narrowest part, between the lowest rib and the iliac crest, and the hip circumference is taken at the widest area of the hips, at the greatest protuberance of the buttocks. The next step is simply to divide the waist measurement by the hip measurement. Welborn and Dhaliwal and Srikanthan, Seeman and Karlamangla confirm this and cite several other investigations that show waist-to-hip ratio being the superior clinical measurement for predicting cardiovascular disease risk. It is inspiring that there is a plethora of research on these anthropometric measurements. BMI is a reliable way to tell if body weight is putting a person at generalized health risk. Much research denotes that waist-to-hip ratio is the superior health risk—categorizing indicator. Many fitness professionals are highly skilled at body composition measurement techniques, such as skinfolds. In completing and explaining the anthropometric and body composition measures for clients, professionals can provide supplementary educational information about reducing cardiometabolic health risks and improving quality of life. Insulin resistance is a condition in which the body produces insulin but the muscle, fat and liver cells do not react with it, and the glucose cannot enter the cell. The pancreas unsuccessfully tries to resolve the problem by producing more insulin. The result is excess glucose buildup in the bloodstream, an antecedent to diabetes. Thus, most people with insulin resistance have high levels of insulin and glucose circulating in their blood. Waist is measured at the narrowest point of the midsection, between the bottom rib and the top of the hip bone. Attie, A. Adopocyte metabolism and obesity. Journal of Lipid Research, 50, S— Hainer, V. Treatment modalities of obesity: What fits whom? Diabetes Care, 31 Suppl. Maffeis, C. Waist-to-height ratio, a useful index to identify high metabolic risk in overweight children. Journal of Pediatrics, 2 , — |
Mir scheint es die ausgezeichnete Phrase
Dieser topic ist einfach unvergleichlich:), mir gefällt.
ich beglückwünsche, Ihre Meinung wird nützlich sein
Welche nötige Phrase... Toll, die glänzende Idee