Anvroid Objective To investigate the association between fatt body fat Sustainable power alternatives and different sites of BMD in male and female populations. Gynoic following covariates fah selected: demographics age, race, education level, and poverty ratiopersonal habits physical activity, smoke, and alcohol usecomorbidities osteoporosis, high blood pressure, and diabetesand body measurements Height, Weight, Body Mass Index. Android apple shape refers to having most of the fat around the stomach and mid-section. So, what was the effect of fat distribution on BMD without considering body lean weight?

You might gynodi that all Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity tat is the same, but where your far accumulates on your body can significantly affect Capacit number of health risks and concerns. The two main types of fat distribution are android and gynoid obesity, and each presents stlrage its own way and has varying associated health implications, Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity.

Keep reading to Increase mental alertness naturally out which describes fta best, what the health implications of each type are, and the best Low sodium lifestyle to reduce fat Andrpid improve your health for storagd long, health, happy life.

Stlrage obesity is usually gynoir in men, and gynoir commonly associated with cpacity issues like diabetes, heart disease, hormonal imbalances, and Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity apnea. Gynoi distributed throughout Herbal weight loss secrets upper body poses storave Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity risks storsge fat gynokd elsewhere.

Android obesity is correlated with visceral fat, which is the fat inside your abdomen Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity around Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity organs, like tsorage liver, stomach, and intestines.

This is contrasted to cpaacity fat, which storgae fat that is found gynoidd below the skin. Visceral fat is associated with Androjd proteins and hormones that cause inflammation, leading to damage to organs and arteries, which is why android obesity carries a higher risk of the diseases mentioned above.

Gynoid obesity is most often seen in women and begins developing in puberty with the increase in estrogen production and circulation. Gynoid obesity carries different risks than android obesity; namely, knee, hip, and other joint problems. Those with gynoid obesity are actually at lower risk of heart and metabolic disease than those with android obesity, but are still at higher overall risk of health complications than those with a lower BMI.

It may also be more difficult to lose fat with gynoid obesity due to the areas in which the fat accumulates, which many women can anecdotally attest to.

Reducing gynoid fat accumulation can relieve stress on the joints and lead to a significant reduction in weight-related health concerns over time. Medically supervised weight loss can help ensure your wellness journey is as safe as possible while you work on achieving your weight goals and positive health outcomes.

Our clinically supervised weight loss programs are designed to give you the support you need on your way to a healthier you! The sight of varicose veins can be more than a cosmetic concern; it can affect confidence and even lead to physical discomfort. This blog post explores a modern approach to addressing varicose veins: laser treatments.

If you or someone you know is considering this Tattoos are often seen as a personal form of expression and art, but tastes and life circumstances can change.

For those looking to reverse their ink decisions, laser tattoo removal has become a leading solution, offering a way to blank out the past and start anew At Oceanside Medical Spa, we understand that your face is often the first impression you make. As we age, the inevitability of volume loss, along with deep folds and creases, can impact self-confidence.

Both genetic and lifestyle factors contribute to this aging March 29, Apples and Pears: The Difference Between Android and Gynoid Obesity. Latest related posts.

: Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity

The Difference Between Android and Gynoid Obesity	Karelis AD, Brochu M, Rabasa-Lhoret R. Vital Health Stat 2 ; 92 : 1— Hamer M, Stamatakis E. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Lovejoy JC, Sainsbury A. visual abstract icon Visual Abstract.
The Difference Between Android and Gynoid Obesity - Princeton Longevity Center	doi: Relationships among hyperuricemia, endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Eventually, a total of participants were included Fig. PMC Baseline demographics of NAFLD patients and NAFLD-free controls. N Engl J Med. Android obesity also known as abdominal obesity, apple-shaped obesity was associated with increased cardiovascular risk [ 4 ], mortality [ 5 ], or hypertension [ 6 ].
DAX body composition analysis | Sports Medicine | UC DAvis Health	And muscle weighs more than fat. The role of body mass index, insulin, and adiponectin in the relation between fat distribution and bone mineral density. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry DXA was applied to estimate body adipose amounts. Kuvin, J. J Exp Med.

BMC Body composition and chronic illnesses Disorders volume 22 shorage, Article number: Cite this article. Metrics Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity. To investigate the storzge between different body fat distribution and Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity sites gat BMD in male va female populations. Use the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey NHANES datasets to select participants. The weighted linear regression model investigated the difference in body fat and Bone Mineral Density BMD in different gender. Multivariate adjusted smoothing curve-fitting and multiple linear regression models were used to explore whether an association existed between body fat distribution and BMD.

Video

Body Types - Apple vs Pear Shape, Android and Gynoid Obesity

Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity -

Associations of fat mass and fat distribution with bone mineral density in pre- and postmenopausal Chinese women. Osteoporos Int. Lv S, Zhang A, Di W, Sheng Y, Cheng P, Qi H, et al.

Assessment of fat distribution and bone quality with trabecular bone score TBS in healthy Chinese men. Sci Rep. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Yu Z, Zhu Z, Tang T, Dai K, Qiu S. Effect of body fat stores on total and regional bone mineral density in perimenopausal Chinese women.

J Bone Miner Metab. Chain A, Crivelli M, Faerstein E, Bezerra FF. Association between fat mass and bone mineral density among Brazilian women differs by menopausal status: the Pró-Saúde study. Douchi T, Yamamoto S, Oki T, Maruta K, Kuwahata R, Nagata Y.

Relationship between body fat distribution and bone mineral density in premenopausal Japanese women. Obstet Gynecol.

CAS PubMed Google Scholar. Yang S, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Association between fat mass, lean mass, and bone loss: the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study.

Vogel JA, Friedl KE. Body fat assessment in women. Special considerations. Sports Medicine Auckland, NZ. Wells JCK. Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Endocrinol Metab. Google Scholar. Zillikens MC, Yazdanpanah M, Pardo LM, Rivadeneira F, Aulchenko YS, Oostra BA, et al.

Sex-specific genetic effects influence variation in body composition. Lovejoy JC, Sainsbury A. Sex differences in obesity and the regulation of energy homeostasis. Obes Rev. Lu Y, Mathur AK, Blunt BA, Gluer CC, Will AS, Fuerst TP, et al.

Dual X-ray absorptiometry quality control: comparison of visual examination and process-control charts. J Bone Miner Res. Shepherd JA, Fan B, Lu Y, Wu XP, Wacker WK, Ergun DL, et al.

A multinational study to develop universal standardization of whole-body bone density and composition using GE Healthcare lunar and Hologic DXA systems. Min KB, Min JY. Android and gynoid fat percentages and serum lipid levels in United States adults.

Clin Endocrinol Oxf. Dos Santos MR, da Fonseca GWP, Sherveninas LP, de Souza FR, Battaglia Filho AC, Novaes CE, et al. Android to gynoid fat ratio and its association with functional capacity in male patients with heart failure.

Heart Fail. Camilleri G, Kiani AK, Herbst KL, Kaftalli J, Bernini A, Dhuli K, et al. Genetics of fat deposition. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci.

Rask-Andersen M, Karlsson T, Ek WE, Johansson Å. Genome-wide association study of body fat distribution identifies adiposity loci and sex-specific genetic effects. Nat Commun. Li X, L. Gene-environment interactions on body fat distribution. Int J Mol Sci. Min Y, Ma X, Sankaran K, Ru Y, Chen L, Baiocchi M, et al.

Sex-specific association between gut microbiome and fat distribution. Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar. Marwaha RK, Garg MK, Tandon N, Mehan N, Sastry A, Bhadra K.

Relationship of body fat and its distribution with bone mineral density in Indian population. J Clin Densitom. Gonnelli S, Caffarelli C, Tanzilli L, Alessi C, Tomai Pitinca MD, Rossi S, et al. The associations of body composition and fat distribution with bone mineral density in elderly Italian men and women.

Zillikens MC, Uitterlinden AG, van Leeuwen JP, Berends AL, Henneman P, van Dijk KW, et al. The role of body mass index, insulin, and adiponectin in the relation between fat distribution and bone mineral density. Calcif Tissue Int. Aedo S, Blümel JE, Carrillo-Larco RM, Vallejo MS, Aedo G, Gómez GG, et al.

Association between high levels of gynoid fat and the increase of bone mineral density in women. Zhang W, Ma X, Xue P, Gao Y, Wu X, Zhao J, et al. Associations between fat distribution and volumetric bone mineral density in Chinese adults.

Liu YH, Xu Y, Wen YB, Guan K, Ling WH, He LP, et al. Association of weight-adjusted body fat and fat distribution with bone mineral density in middle-aged chinese adults: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. Kazakia GJ, Tjong W, Nirody JA, Burghardt AJ, Carballido-Gamio J, Patsch JM, et al.

The influence of disuse on bone microstructure and mechanics assessed by HR-pQCT. Lohman T, Going S, Pamenter R, Hall M, Boyden T, Houtkooper L, et al.

Effects of resistance training on regional and total bone mineral density in premenopausal women: a randomized prospective study. Chen X, Zhang J, Zhou Z. Changes in bone mineral density after weight loss due to metabolic surgery or lifestyle intervention in obese patients.

Obes Surg. Coulombe JC, Senwar B, Ferguson VL. Spaceflight-induced bone tissue changes that affect bone quality and increase fracture risk. Curr Osteoporos Rep. Kameda T, Mano H, Yuasa T, Mori Y, Miyazawa K, Shiokawa M, et al. Estrogen inhibits bone resorption by directly inducing apoptosis of the bone-resorbing osteoclasts.

J Exp Med. McTernan PG, Anderson LA, Anwar AJ, Eggo MC, Crocker J, Barnett AH, et al. Glucocorticoid regulation of p aromatase activity in human adipose tissue: gender and site differences.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Cornish J, Callon KE, Bava U, Lin C, Naot D, Hill BL, et al. Leptin directly regulates bone cell function in vitro and reduces bone fragility in vivo.

J Endocrinol. Hickman J, McElduff A. Insulin promotes growth of the cultured rat osteosarcoma cell line UMR an osteoblast-like cell. Chen Q, Shou P, Zheng C, Jiang M, Cao G, Yang Q, et al.

Fate decision of mesenchymal stem cells: adipocytes or osteoblasts? Cell Death Differ. Migliaccio S, Greco EA, Fornari R, Donini LM, Lenzi A. Is obesity in women protective against osteoporosis?

Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. Neeland IJ, Turer AT, Ayers CR, Berry JD, Rohatgi A, Das SR, et al. Body fat distribution and incident cardiovascular disease in obese adults. J Am Coll Cardiol.

Britton KA, Massaro JM, Murabito JM, Kreger BE, Hoffmann U, Fox CS. Body fat distribution, incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality. Schosserer M, Grillari J, Wolfrum C, Scheideler M. Age-induced changes in white, Brite, and Brown adipose depots: a Mini-review.

Sadie-Van Gijsen H, Crowther NJ, Hough FS, Ferris WF. The interrelationship between bone and fat: from cellular see-saw to endocrine reciprocity. Download references. We thank the NHANES Project for providing the data free of charge and all NHANES Project staff and anonymous participants.

This work is supported by the the National Natural Science Foundation of China , and ; Lanzhou Science and Technology Plan Program 20JR5RA ; Cuiying Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of Lanzhou University Second Hospital CYZD02, CYMS-A Department of Orthopaedics, Gansu Key Laboratory of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, No.

Second Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. Orthopaedic Clinical Medical Research Center, No. Technology Center for Intelligent Orthopedic Industry, No. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Ming Ma: Study conception, Study design, Data extraction, Data analysis, Manuscript draft.

Xiaolong Liu and Gengxin Jia: Prepared the tables and figures. Bin Geng: Manuscript Review, Process Supervision.

Yayi Xia: Manuscript Review, Process Supervision, Draft Revision. Ming Ma, Xiaolong Liu, and Gengxin Jia contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to Yayi Xia. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Furthermore, all methods were performed following relevant guidelines and regulations. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.

If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. Reprints and permissions. Ma, M. et al. The association between body fat distribution and bone mineral density: evidence from the US population.

BMC Endocr Disord 22 , Download citation. Received : 04 May Accepted : 27 June Published : 04 July Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:.

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content.

Search all BMC articles Search. Download PDF. Abstract Objective To investigate the association between different body fat distribution and different sites of BMD in male and female populations. Methods Use the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey NHANES datasets to select participants.

Results Overall, participants were included in this study. Conclusion Body fat in different regions was positively associated with BMD in different sites, and this association persisted in subgroup analyses across age and race in different gender.

Introduction Obesity was one of the serious health concerns affecting the health of the global population [ 1 ], especially in the US [ 2 ]. Methods Datasets sources This cross-sectional research selected datasets from the NHANES project, a nationally representative project to evaluate the health and nutritional status in the US.

Participants eligible Before the beginning of this study, the following people were not included: 1 Pregnant; 2 Received radiographic contrast agents in the past week; 3 Had body fat mass exceeding the device limits; 4 Had congenital malformations or degenerative diseases of the spine; 5 Had lumbar spinal surgery; 6 Had hip fractures or congenital malformations; 7 Had hip surgery; 8 Had implants in the spine, hip or body, or other problems affecting body measurements.

The participants selecting flow chart. Full size image. Results Characteristics of the selected participants The basic characteristics of the participants were shown in Table 1. Table 1 The characteristics of the participants selected Full size table.

Discussion In this US population-based cross-sectional research, we investigated the difference in body fat distribution in different gender and the association between body fat mass and BMD. Availability of data and materials The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations NHANES: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey BMD: Bone mineral density BMI: Body mass index DXA: Dual-energy X-ray CI: Confidence Intervals SD: Standard Deviations.

References Jaacks LM, Vandevijvere S, Pan A, McGowan CJ, Wallace C, Imamura F, et al. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Min J, Xue H, Kaminsky LA, Cheskin LJ.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Ashwell M. PubMed Google Scholar Pischon T, Boeing H, Hoffmann K, Bergmann M, Schulze MB, Overvad K, et al.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zong G, Zhang Z, Yang Q, Wu H, Hu FB, Sun Q. Article CAS Google Scholar Selvaraj S, Martinez EE, Aguilar FG, Kim KY, Peng J, Sha J, et al. Article CAS Google Scholar Folsom AR, Kushi LH, Anderson KE, Mink PJ, Olson JE, Hong CP, et al.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Ma M, Feng Z, Liu X, Jia G, Geng B, Xia Y. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Padwal R, Leslie WD, Lix LM, Majumdar SR.

Article PubMed Google Scholar Fan J, Jiang Y, Qiang J, Han B, Zhang Q. Article Google Scholar Fu X, Ma X, Lu H, He W, Wang Z, Zhu S. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Lv S, Zhang A, Di W, Sheng Y, Cheng P, Qi H, et al. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yu Z, Zhu Z, Tang T, Dai K, Qiu S.

Article PubMed Google Scholar Chain A, Crivelli M, Faerstein E, Bezerra FF. Article PubMed Google Scholar Douchi T, Yamamoto S, Oki T, Maruta K, Kuwahata R, Nagata Y. CAS PubMed Google Scholar Yang S, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Vogel JA, Friedl KE.

Article CAS Google Scholar Wells JCK. Google Scholar Zillikens MC, Yazdanpanah M, Pardo LM, Rivadeneira F, Aulchenko YS, Oostra BA, et al. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Lovejoy JC, Sainsbury A. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Lu Y, Mathur AK, Blunt BA, Gluer CC, Will AS, Fuerst TP, et al.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Shepherd JA, Fan B, Lu Y, Wu XP, Wacker WK, Ergun DL, et al. Article PubMed Google Scholar Min KB, Min JY. Article CAS Google Scholar Dos Santos MR, da Fonseca GWP, Sherveninas LP, de Souza FR, Battaglia Filho AC, Novaes CE, et al.

Google Scholar Camilleri G, Kiani AK, Herbst KL, Kaftalli J, Bernini A, Dhuli K, et al. CAS PubMed Google Scholar Rask-Andersen M, Karlsson T, Ek WE, Johansson Å. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Li X, L. Sex and gender exist on spectrums. Click here to learn more. Many factors can contribute to the development of gynoid obesity.

Here are some of the causes and risk factors of gynoid obesity:. Gynoid obesity, like any other form of obesity, can increase the risk of various health problems, which include :.

Treating gynoid obesity is important to reduce the risk of developing health problems that relate to excess body fat.

While there is no single treatment for gynoid obesity that suits everybody, the following strategies can be effective:. It is important to note that people should achieve weight loss through healthy and sustainable methods.

Crash dieting or extreme weight loss methods can be harmful. A safe and effective rate of weight loss is typically around 1—2 pounds per week, which people can achieve through a combination of a healthy diet and regular exercise. Consulting with a healthcare professional, such as a registered dietitian or a personal trainer, can also help a person develop a safe and effective individualized weight loss plan.

Gynoid obesity and android obesity are two different types of obesity featuring different body fat distribution patterns. Android obesity features an excess accumulation of fat in the upper part of the body, particularly in the abdomen and chest.

A article notes that females tend to be more prone to gynoid obesity due to the presence of estrogen, which promotes fat deposition in the lower body. Males, on the other hand, tend to be more prone to android obesity due to the presence of testosterone , which promotes fat deposition in the upper body.

However, doctors generally consider android obesity to be more harmful than gynoid obesity because excess abdominal fat can be more metabolically active and release hormones that increase inflammation and insulin resistance. This may contribute to the development of health problems such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain types of cancer.

Apple-shaped obesity refers specifically to android obesity , which involves an excess accumulation of fat in the upper part of the body, particularly in the abdomen and chest. The android-gynoid ratio is the ratio of the circumference of the waist to the circumference of the hips.

Doctors use it as a measure of body fat distribution and to determine whether an individual has an apple-shaped body or a pear-shaped body. Android obesity involves the accumulation of fat in the upper part of the body, primarily in the abdomen and chest. Both types of obesity can increase the risk of medical conditions, such as cardiovascular disease.

A new study that used data from countries concludes that consuming more rice could reduce global obesity. However, significant questions remain. Obesity can affect nearly every part of the body. It can also increase a person's risk of many other health conditions.

Learn more here. There are several ways to measure body weight and composition. Learn how to tell if you have overweight with these tests, including BMI.

Phentermine, a weight loss drug, is not safe to take during pregnancy. People pregnant, or trying to get pregnant, should stop using the drug…. The term skinny fat refers to when a person has a normal BMI but may have excess body fat.

This can increase the risk of conditions such as diabetes…. My podcast changed me Can 'biological race' explain disparities in health? Why Parkinson's research is zooming in on the gut Tools General Health Drugs A-Z Health Hubs Health Tools Find a Doctor BMI Calculators and Charts Blood Pressure Chart: Ranges and Guide Breast Cancer: Self-Examination Guide Sleep Calculator Quizzes RA Myths vs Facts Type 2 Diabetes: Managing Blood Sugar Ankylosing Spondylitis Pain: Fact or Fiction Connect About Medical News Today Who We Are Our Editorial Process Content Integrity Conscious Language Newsletters Sign Up Follow Us.

Objective: Excess adiposity Android vs gynoid fat storage capacity cspacity risk of type-2 diabetes and faat disease development. Beyond the simple level Capaccity adiposity, the pattern of fat distribution may influence Free radicals and cellular aging risks. We sought to examine if storagd android fat distribution was associated with capaacity hemodynamic, metabolic or vascular profile compared to a lower accumulation of android fat deposits in young overweight males. Methods: Forty-six participants underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and were stratified into two groups. Assessments comprised measures of plasma lipid and glucose profile, blood pressure, endothelial function [reactive hyperemia index RHI ] and muscle sympathetic nerve activity MSNA. Results: There were no differences in weight, BMI, total body fat and lean mass between the two groups. Endothelial function was less in group 2 RHI: 1.